...
首页> 外文期刊>Food and Nutrition Sciences >Protein Quality Evaluation of Animal Food Proteins by In-Vitro Methodologies
【24h】

Protein Quality Evaluation of Animal Food Proteins by In-Vitro Methodologies

机译:动物食品蛋白质的蛋白质质量体外评价方法

获取原文

摘要

Animal protein foods are undoubtedly among the most concentrated source of essential amino acids (AA) for the human diet. However, their high prices and diseases associated to their excessive consumption have fomented the consumption of other alternative sources of animal proteins such as those from marine or aquatic species. Sonora is a well recognized producer of animal foods in Mexico, both terrestrial and aquatic. In this study, the protein quality evaluation of these animal food sources, highly produced and consumed in Sonora, is proposed, using in-vitro methodologies. Four different species, from each aquatic and terrestrial origin, were selected. Samples of lean muscle were used in all cases. Various in-vitro methodologies for protein quality evaluation were selected, alternatives to the animal bioassays: % digestibility, Total amino acid analyses (HPLC), PDCAAS, computerized PER calculations (C-PER and DC-PER) and total collagen contents. % in-vitro digestibility presented significant differences among samples from terrestrial species, but muscle from aquatic species did not showed significant differences. All sources of proteins, both aquatic and terrestrial proved to be rich sources of essential amino acids. PDCAAS was unable to establish significant differences in protein quality among sources of protein from different origin. Both methods C-PER and DC-PER were more exact in their results and were able to detect significant differences among samples of different origin. An important finding was the great difference in the total collagen content between aquatic and terrestrial sources of proteins, where terrestrial muscle proteins had almost 10-time more collagen than aquatic protein sources. However, these collagen contents did not seem to have a significant influence in the protein quality of these animal proteins. These muscle proteins, from both aquatic and terrestrial species, confirmed to have a high protein quality and some of the in-vitro methodologies used in this study represent a valuable alternative to the animal bioassays.
机译:动物蛋白食品无疑是人类饮食中最浓缩的必需氨基酸(AA)来源之一。然而,它们的高价格和与它们过度消费有关的疾病促使人们消费了其他替代性动物蛋白来源,例如来自海洋或水生物种的动物蛋白。 Sonora是墨西哥公认的陆生和水生动物食品生产商。在这项研究中,提出了使用体外方法对在Sonora中大量生产和消费的这些动物食物来源的蛋白质质量进行评估的方法。从每个水生和陆生起源中选择了四个不同的物种。在所有情况下均使用瘦肌肉样本。选择了多种用于蛋白质质量评估的体外方法,替代了动物生物测定法:消化率%,总氨基酸分析(HPLC),PDCAAS,计算机化的PER计算(C-PER和DC-PER)和总胶原含量。 %的体外消化率在陆生物种的样品中显示出显着差异,但水生物种的肌肉并未显示出显着差异。水和陆地的所有蛋白质来源都被证明是必需氨基酸的丰富来源。 PDCAAS无法在不同来源的蛋白质来源之间建立明显的蛋白质质量差异。 C-PER和DC-PER两种方法的结果均更为精确,并且能够检测出不同来源样品之间的显着差异。一个重要的发现是水生和陆生蛋白质来源之间的总胶原蛋白含量存在巨大差异,其中陆生肌肉蛋白的胶原蛋白含量几乎是水生蛋白质来源的10倍。但是,这些胶原蛋白含量似乎对这些动物蛋白的蛋白质质量没有显着影响。这些来自水生和陆生物种的肌肉蛋白被证实具有较高的蛋白质量,并且本研究中使用的一些体外方法学代表了动物生物测定的一种有价值的替代方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号