首页> 外文期刊>Global Media and China >A comparative case study: Network agenda setting in crisis and non-crisis news:
【24h】

A comparative case study: Network agenda setting in crisis and non-crisis news:

机译:比较案例研究:危机和非危机新闻中的网络议程设置:

获取原文
       

摘要

In order to explore the Chinese traditional media role on social media platforms, this study examined the agenda-setting effects between the networked attribute agendas of Chinese traditional media and various opinion leaders on Weibo in one crisis and non-crisis news, respectively. The results showed that Chinese traditional media failed to lead the discussion on Weibo in both the crisis and non-crisis cases. However, business elites tended to be the most influential opinion leaders in both circumstances. Furthermore, the news agendas of traditional media and the opinion leaders changed in both cases.
机译:为了探讨中国传统媒体在社交媒体平台上的作用,本研究考察了中国传统媒体的网络属性议程与微博上的各种舆论领袖在一次危机和非危机新闻中的议程设置效果。结果表明,无论是在危机案例还是非危机案例中,中国传统媒体都未能主导有关微博的讨论。但是,在这两种情况下,商界精英往往是最有影响力的舆论领袖。此外,传统媒体和舆论领袖的新闻议程在两种情况下都发生了变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号