首页> 外文期刊>Family medicine >Identifying Students at Risk of Failing the USMLE Step 2 Clinical Skills Examination
【24h】

Identifying Students at Risk of Failing the USMLE Step 2 Clinical Skills Examination

机译:确定有可能无法通过USMLE步骤2临床技能考试的学生

获取原文
       

摘要

Background and Objectives: New standards announced in 2017 could increase the failure rate for Step 2 Clinical Skills (CS). The purpose of this study was to identify student performance metrics associated with risk of failing.Methods: Data for 1,041 graduates of one medical school from 2014 through 2017 were analyzed, including 30 (2.9%) failures. Metrics included Medical College Admission Test, United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1, and clerkship National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) Subject Examination scores; faculty ratings in six clerkships; and scores on an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Bivariate statistics and regression were used to estimate risk of failing.Results: Those failing had lower Step 1 scores, NBME scores, faculty ratings, and OSCE scores (PPP=.02), low pediatrics NBME scores (RR 3.67, P=.02), low ratings in internal medicine (RR 3.42, P=.004), and low OSCE Communication/Interpersonal Skills (RR 2.55, P=.02).Conclusions: Certain medical student performance metrics are associated with risk of failing Step 2 CS. It is important to clarify these and advise students accordingly.
机译:背景和目标:2017年宣布的新标准可能会增加第二步临床技能(CS)的失败率。本研究的目的是确定与失败风险相关的学生表现指标。方法:分析了2014年至2017年一所医学院的1,041名毕业生的数据,其中包括30名(2.9%)失败。衡量标准包括医学院入学考试,美国医学许可考试第1步和美国国家医学检查官委员会(NBME)学科考试成绩;六个文员的教师等级;并根据客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)进行评分。结果:那些失败者的第1步得分,NBME得分,教职人员评分和OSCE得分(PPP = .02)较低,而儿科NBME得分较低(RR 3.67,P = .02)。 ),内部医学评分低(RR 3.42,P = .004)和OSCE沟通/人际交往能力低(RR 2.55,P = .02)。结论:某些医学生的绩效指标与步骤2 CS失败的风险相关。重要的是要澄清这些并相应地建议学生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号