...
首页> 外文期刊>Gut and Liver >Real-World Clinical Efficacy and Tolerability of Direct-Acting Antivirals in Hepatitis C Monoinfection Compared to Hepatitis C/Human Immunodeficiency Virus Coinfection in a Community Care Setting
【24h】

Real-World Clinical Efficacy and Tolerability of Direct-Acting Antivirals in Hepatitis C Monoinfection Compared to Hepatitis C/Human Immunodeficiency Virus Coinfection in a Community Care Setting

机译:在社区护理环境中,直接作用抗病毒药在丙型肝炎单次感染中的实际疗效和耐受性与丙型肝炎/人类免疫缺陷病毒合并感染相比

获取原文
           

摘要

Background/Aims Limited data exist comparing the safety and efficacy of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) in hepatitis C virus (HCV) monoinfected and HCV/human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfected patients in the real-world clinic practice setting. Methods All HCV monoinfected and HCV/HIV coinfected patients treated with DAAs between January 2014 and October 2017 in community clinic settings were retrospectively analyzed. Pretreatment baseline patient characteristics, treatment efficacy, factors affecting sustained virologic response at 12 weeks (SVR12) after treatment, and adverse reactions were compared between the groups. Results A total of 327 patients were included in the study, of which 253 were HCV monoinfected, and 74 were HCV/HIV coinfected. There was a statistically significant difference observed in SVR12 when comparing HCV monoinfection and HCV/HIV coinfection (94% and 84%, respectively, p=0.005). However, there were no significant factors identified as a predictor of a reduced response. The most common adverse effect was fatigue (27%). No significant drug interaction was observed between DAA and antiretroviral therapy. None of the patients discontinued the treatment due to adverse events. Conclusions In a real-world setting, DAA regimens have lower SVR12 in HCV/HIV coinfection than in HCV monoinfection. Further studies involving a higher number of HCV/HIV coinfected patients are needed to identify real predictors of a reduced response.
机译:背景/目的在现实世界的临床实践环境中,比较直接作用抗病毒药物(DAA)在丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)单感染和HCV /人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)合并感染的患者中的安全性和有效性的有限数据。方法回顾性分析2014年1月至2017年10月在社区门诊接受DAA治疗的所有HCV单感染和HCV / HIV合并感染患者。比较两组之间治疗前的基线患者特征,治疗效果,影响治疗后12周(SVR12)持续病毒学应答的因素以及不良反应。结果共纳入327例患者,其中HCV单感染253例,HCV / HIV合并感染74例。比较HCV单一感染和HCV / HIV合并感染时,在SVR12中观察到统计学上的显着差异(分别为94%和84%,p = 0.005)。但是,没有任何重要因素被确定为反应降低的预测因素。最常见的不良反应是疲劳(27%)。在DAA和抗逆转录病毒疗法之间未观察到明显的药物相互作用。没有患者因不良事件而中断治疗。结论在现实世界中,DAA方案在HCV / HIV合并感染中的SVR12低于HCV单一感染。需要进一步的研究,包括更多的HCV / HIV合并感染患者,以识别出反应降低的真正预测因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号