...
首页> 外文期刊>Engenharia Agrícola >DEPOSITION AND COVERAGE OF SOYBEAN LEAF SURFACES BY SPRAYS APPLIED USING DIFFERENT ASSISTED BOOM SPRAYER SYSTEMS
【24h】

DEPOSITION AND COVERAGE OF SOYBEAN LEAF SURFACES BY SPRAYS APPLIED USING DIFFERENT ASSISTED BOOM SPRAYER SYSTEMS

机译:使用不同的辅助喷涂系统对大豆叶面进行沉积和覆盖

获取原文

摘要

Maintaining homogeneity in the distribution of fungicidal sprays applied throughout the plant, minimizing the variation between the upper and lower third of the plant, is one of the main challenges for application technologies with regard to soybean crops. To increase the deposition and leaf coverage of sprayed compounds, especially in the middle and lower thirds of the plant, we developed and tested alternative assisted boom sprayer systems. In this study, three assisted boom sprayer systems (Vortex ? , Dropleg ? , and chain curtain) were evaluated, in addition to the conventional system, in terms of the deposition and coverage of the leaf surface they achieved in the upper, middle, and lower thirds of plants using the fluorescent tracer Helios SC 500?. The assisted boom sprayer systems allowed the sprayed mixture to be better distributed throughout the plant. With the conventional spray system (without assitance), the deposition in the upper third was approximately 26 times higher than that in the lower third, whereas with the use of the assisted boom sprayer systems, the difference in deposition between these thirds was 11 times higher. Among the evaluated systems, the Dropleg ? system presented the lowest depositional variation, which was only 5.5 times higher in the upper than in the lower third, because of the increased deposition achieved in the lower third of the plant. Leaf coverage varied from 41% to 81% in the upper third, from 24% to 43% in the middle third, and from 4% to 13% in the lower third of the plant. Using the conventional spray system, the leaf surface coverage was approximately 13 times higher in the upper third than in the lower third of the plant, whereas with the use of the assisted boom sprayer systems, especially the Dropleg ? system, this variation was reduced by 73%, and the coverage of the upper and lower thirds only differed by 3.5 times. Indeed, the Dropleg ? system reached a leaf coverage of close to 13% in the lower third of the plant. The use of assisted boom sprayer systems improved the distribution of the mixture applied throughout the plant, reducing the differences among the thirds of the plant both in the levels of deposition and coverage of the leaf surfaces. The Dropleg? system increased the deposition and leaf coverage in the lower third of the plant the most, facilitating better distribution of the mixture.
机译:在整个作物上施用杀真菌喷雾剂的过程中保持均匀性,最大程度地减少植物上部和下部三分之一之间的差异,是大豆作物施用技术面临的主要挑战之一。为了增加被喷洒的化合物的沉积和叶片覆盖率,特别是在植物的中下部,我们开发并测试了替代的辅助喷杆喷雾器系统。在这项研究中,除常规系统外,还评估了三种辅助动臂喷雾器系统(Vortex®,Dropleg®和链式幕帘)在上部,中部和下部的叶片表面的沉积和覆盖范围。使用荧光示踪剂Helios SC 500?降低了三分之一的植物。辅助动臂喷雾器系统可使喷雾混合物更好地分布在整个工厂中。在传统的喷雾系统(无辅助)下,上三分之一的沉积物比下三分之一的沉积物高约26倍,而使用辅助动臂喷雾器系统时,这三者之间的沉积物差异高出11倍。在评估系统中,Dropleg?该系统呈现出最低的沉积变化,其上部仅比下部的三分之一高5.5倍,这是因为在植物下部的三分之一实现了增加的沉积。上部三分之一的叶子覆盖率从41%到81%,中间三分之一从24%到43%,下部三分之一从4%到13%。使用常规的喷雾系统,植物上部三分之一的叶子表面覆盖率大约是下部三分之一,而使用辅助喷杆喷雾器系统,尤其是Dropleg™系统中,这种差异减少了73%,上下三分之二的覆盖率仅相差3.5倍。的确,Dropleg吗?该系统在植物的下三分之一处的叶片覆盖率接近13%。辅助动臂喷洒器系统的使用改善了整个植物上施用的混合物的分布,从而减少了三分之一植物在叶面沉积和覆盖水平上的差异。 Dropleg?系统最大程度地增加了植物下部三分之一的沉积和叶片覆盖率,有利于混合物的更好分配。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号