首页> 外文期刊>Globalization and Health >‘BRICS without straw’? A systematic literature review of newly emerging economies’ influence in global health
【24h】

‘BRICS without straw’? A systematic literature review of newly emerging economies’ influence in global health

机译:“没有稻草的金砖”?对新兴经济体对全球健康的影响的系统文献综述

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Since 2010, five newly emerging economies collectively known as ‘BRICS’ (Brazil, India, Russia, China and South Africa) have caught the imagination, and scholarly attention, of political scientists, economists and development specialists. The prospect of a unified geopolitical bloc, consciously seeking to re-frame international (and global) health development with a new set of ideas and values, has also, if belatedly, begun to attract the attention of the global health community. But what influence, if any, do the BRICS wield in global health, and, if they do wield influence, how has that influence been conceptualized and recorded in the literature? Methods We conducted a systematic literature review in (March-December 2012) of documents retrieved from the databases EMBASE, PubMed/Medline, Global Health, and Google Scholar, and the websites of relevant international organisations, research institutions and philanthropic organisations. The results were synthesised using a framework of influence developed for the review from the political science literature. Results Our initial search of databases and websites yielded 887 documents. Exclusion criteria narrowed the number of documents to 71 journal articles and 23 reports. Two researchers using an agreed set of inclusion criteria independently screened the 94 documents, leaving just 7 documents. We found just one document that provided sustained analysis of the BRICS’ collective influence; the overwhelming tendency was to describe individual BRICS countries influence. Although influence was predominantly framed by BRICS countries’ material capability, there were examples of institutional and ideational influence - particularly from Brazil. Individual BRICS countries were primarily ‘opportunity seekers’ and region mobilisers but with potential to become ‘issue leaders’ and region organisers. Conclusion Though small in number, the written output on BRICS influence in global health has increased significantly since a similar review conducted in 2010 found just one study. Whilst it may still be ‘early days’ for newly-emerging economies influence in global health to have matured, we argue that there is scope to further develop the concept of influence in global health, but also to better understand the ontology of groups of countries such as BRICS. The BRICS have made a number of important commitments towards reforming global health, but if they are to be more than a memorable acronym they need to start putting those collective commitments into action. Keywords BRICS, global health, influence, newly emerging economies, Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa.
机译:背景资料自2010年以来,五个被统称为“金砖国家”的新兴经济体(巴西,印度,俄罗斯,中国和南非)引起了政治学家,经济学家和发展专家的想象力和学术关注。统一地缘政治集团的前景,有意识地试图以一套新的思想和价值观来重新构架国际(和全球)卫生发展,但如果迟来了,也已经开始引起全球卫生界的关注。但是,金砖四国对全球健康有何影响(如果有的话),如果有影响,那么这些影响如何被概念化并记录在文献中呢?方法我们对(从2012年3月至12月)从EMBASE,PubMed / Medline,Global Health和Google Scholar数据库以及相关国际组织,研究机构和慈善组织的网站中检索到的文档进行了系统的文献综述。使用从政治学文献中发展出来的影响力框架对结果进行了综合。结果我们最初对数据库和网站的搜索产生了887个文档。排除标准将文件数量缩小到71种期刊文章和23种报告。两名研究人员使用一套同意的纳入标准独立筛选了94份文档,仅剩下7份文档。我们发现只有一份文件可以对金砖国家的集体影响进行持续分析。压倒性的趋势是描述单个金砖国家的影响。尽管影响主要是由金砖国家的物质能力来决定的,但还是有一些制度和观念上的影响的例子,尤其是来自巴西的影响。金砖国家/地区主要是“寻求机会”和地区动员者,但有可能成为“问题领袖”和地区组织者。结论自2010年进行的一项类似审查仅发现一项研究以来,尽管金砖四国的数量很少,但有关金砖五国对全球健康影响的书面产出却显着增加。尽管新兴经济体在全球卫生中的影响力仍可能处于“早期”状态,但我们认为,存在进一步发展全球卫生影响力概念的空间,也可以更好地理解国家集团的本体论例如金砖四国。金砖国家在改革全球卫生方面做出了许多重要承诺,但如果要成为一个令人难忘的首字母缩略词,则需要开始将这些集体承诺付诸行动。关键词金砖国家,全球健康,影响力,新兴经济体,巴西,俄罗斯,印度,中国,南非。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号