...
首页> 外文期刊>Globalization and Health >TRIPS, the Doha declaration and paragraph 6 decision: what are the remaining steps for protecting access to medicines?
【24h】

TRIPS, the Doha declaration and paragraph 6 decision: what are the remaining steps for protecting access to medicines?

机译:TRIPS,多哈宣言和第6段决定:保护获得药物的剩余步骤是什么?

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background The World Trade Organisation's Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health (known as the Doha Declaration) of 2001, and subsequent Decision on the Interpretation of Paragraph 6 reached in 2003, affirmed the flexibilities available under the Agreement on Trade Related Property Rights (TRIPS) to member states seeking to protect public health. Despite these important clarifications, the actual implementation of these measures to improve access to medicines remains uncertain. There are also concerns that so-called TRIPS-plus measures within many regional and bilateral trade agreements are further undermining the capacity of the poor to access affordable medicines. Methods The paper reviews policy debates among governments, nongovernmental organisations and international organisations from 1995, and notably since 2003, surrounding access to medicines and trade agreements. The provisions for protecting public health provided by the Doha Declaration and Paragraph 6 Decision are reviewed in terms of challenges for implementation, along with measures to protect intellectual property rights (IPRs) under selected regional and bilateral trade agreements. Results While provisions, in principle, were affirmed for member states under the TRIPS agreement to protect public health, numerous challenges remain. Implementation of the flexibilities has been hindered by lack of capacity in many LMICs. More intransigent have been stark inequalities in power and influence among trading nations, leaving LMICs vulnerable to pressures to permit the globalization of IPRs in order to protect broader trade and economic interests. Such inequalities are apparent in proposals or adopted TRIPS-plus measures which re-establish the primacy of trade over public health goals. Conclusion Despite being hailed as a "watershed in international trade", the Doha Declaration and Paragraph 6 decision have not resolved the problem of access to affordable medicines. The way forward must begin with a simplification of their content, to enable actual implementation. More fundamentally, once agreed, public health protections under TRIPS must be recognised as taking precedent over measures subsequently adopted under other trade agreements. This requires, above all, setting aside such protections as a basic need and shared goal from trade negotiations at all levels.
机译:背景资料2001年世界贸易组织的《关于与贸易有关的知识产权协议和公共卫生的宣言》(又称《多哈宣言》)以及随后于2003年达成的关于解释第6段的决定,确认了《与贸易有关的产权协定》(TRIPS)的灵活性。 )以寻求保护公众健康的成员国。尽管作出了这些重要的澄清,但仍无法确定这些措施的实际执行情况以改善获得药物的机会。还令人担忧的是,许多区域和双边贸易协定中所谓的TRIPS +措施正在进一步削弱穷人获得可负担药品的能力。方法本文回顾了自1995年以来(尤其是自2003年以来)政府,非政府组织和国际组织之间有关药物获取和贸易协定的政策辩论。审查了《多哈宣言》和第6段《决定》中规定的保护公共卫生的规定,以及在某些区域和双边贸易协定下保护知识产权(IPR)的措施。结果虽然原则上确认了《 TRIPS协定》为成员国保护公共卫生的规定,但仍然存在许多挑战。由于许多中低收入国家能力不足,阻碍了灵活性的实施。贸易国之间权力和影响之间的不平等现象更加顽固,使中低收入国家容易承受允许知识产权全球化以保护更广泛的贸易和经济利益的压力。这种不平等现象在提议或已采取的TRIPS +措施中很明显,这些措施重新确立了贸易对公共卫生目标的优先地位。结论尽管被誉为“国际贸易的分水岭”,但《多哈宣言》和第6段的决定仍未解决获得负担得起的药品的问题。前进的道路必须从简化其内容开始,以实现实际的实现。从根本上说,一旦达成协议,必须承认TRIPS协议下的公共卫生保护先于其他贸易协议下随后采取的措施。最重要的是,这需要在所有级别的贸易谈判中将此类保护作为基本需求和共同目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号