首页> 外文期刊>Genetika >Specificity and sensitivity of three PCR-based methods for detection of Erwinia amylovora in pure culture and plant material
【24h】

Specificity and sensitivity of three PCR-based methods for detection of Erwinia amylovora in pure culture and plant material

机译:三种基于PCR的纯培养物和植物材料中检测解淀粉欧文氏菌的特异性和敏感性

获取原文
           

摘要

Three PCR methods, referred in this study as ?conventional“, ?nested“ and ?chromosomal“ PCR and suggested for routine detection of Erwinia amylovora in pure culture and plant material, were evaluated according to their specificity and sensitivity. Specificity of PCR methods was analyzed by using 42 strains of E. amylovora, originating from different locations and plant species, with diverse PFGE profiles, representing distant populations of the pathogen. Sensitivity of PCR protocols in pure culture was studied by using nine different concentrations of E. amylovora in sterile ultrapure water as a template in PCR reactions. In order to study inhibitory effect of plant DNA and other inhibitors on sensitivity of the three PCR methods bacterial dilutions were mixed with plant macerate of pear, apple and quince prior to the PCR reaction. In specificity assays, tested PCR protocols were able to detect all E. amylovora strains regardless of the host of the strain, its origin or PFGE group, indicating primer specificity. On the other hand, sensitivity among tested methods varied, depending on bacterial concentration and selected plant material used in the PCR. When working with pure cultures nested PCR showed the greatest sensitivity by detecting 1.9 bacterial cells per PCR reaction, followed by detection limit of 9.5 cells per PCR reaction with conventional PCR and 1.9′105 cells/PCR reaction with chromosomal PCR. In spiked samples plant inhibitors either did not affect or they decreased the sensitivity of the PCR reaction, depending on the protocol and/or type of plant macerate. In our experiments, inhibitors from pear and quince macerates did not affect sensitivity of nested PCR, while apple macerate reduced its sensitivity by a factor of 10. Conventional PCR protocol was able to detect 95 cells/PCR reaction in pear and apple macerate, but only 9.5′103 cells/PCR in quince macerate. Greatest decrease in sensitivity of the PCR method was observed in spiked samples with chromosomal PCR since bacterial DNA was not detected in each of the spiked samples. Our research shows that all three PCR protocols are specific for detection of E. amylovora, but nested PCR proved to be most sensitive when working with pure cultures and plant material.
机译:根据其特异性和敏感性,对三种PCR方法(本研究中分别称为“常规”,“嵌套”和“染色体” PCR)提出了建议用于常规检测纯培养物和植物材料中的解淀粉欧文氏菌。 PCR方法的特异性通过使用42株来自不同地区和植物物种,具有不同PFGE图谱,代表远处病原菌的链霉菌进行分析。通过在无菌超纯水中使用九种不同浓度的支链淀粉肠杆菌作为PCR反应的模板,研究了纯培养液中PCR方案的敏感性。为了研究植物DNA和其他抑制剂对三种PCR方法敏感性的抑制作用,在PCR反应之前,将细菌稀释液与梨,苹果和木瓜的植物浸渍液混合。在特异性分析中,经过测试的PCR方案能够检测所有链球菌大肠杆菌菌株,而与菌株的宿主,来源或PFGE组无关,表明了引物的特异性。另一方面,测试方法之间的灵敏度会有所不同,具体取决于细菌浓度和PCR中使用的所选植物材料。当与纯培养物一起使用时,巢式PCR通过检测每个PCR反应1.9个细菌细胞,然后以常规PCR检测每个PCR反应9.5个细胞的限度和使用染色体PCR的1.9'105个细胞/ PCR反应的最大检出限。在加标样品中,植物抑制剂要么不起作用,要么降低PCR反应的敏感性,具体取决于方案和/或植物浸渍物的类型。在我们的实验中,梨和苹果浸渍液的抑制剂不会影响巢式PCR的敏感性,而苹果酸浸渍液的敏感性降低了10倍。常规PCR方案能够检测梨和苹果浸渍液中的95个细胞/ PCR反应,但仅9.5'103细胞/ PCR浸在木中。由于在每个加标样品中均未检测到细菌DNA,因此在使用染色体PCR的加标样品中观察到PCR方法灵敏度的最大下降。我们的研究表明,所有三种PCR规程均特定于检测淀粉双歧杆菌,但事实证明,巢式PCR对纯培养物和植物材料最敏感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号