...
首页> 外文期刊>Eurosurveillance >Comparison of serological assays in human Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS)-coronavirus infection
【24h】

Comparison of serological assays in human Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS)-coronavirus infection

机译:人类中东呼吸综合征(MERS)-冠状病毒感染的血清学检测方法比较

获取原文

摘要

Plaque reduction neutralisation tests (PRNT), microneutralisation (MN), Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS)-spike pseudoparticle neutralisation (ppNT) and MERS S1-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) antibody titres were compared using 95 sera from 17 patients with MERS, collected two to 46 days after symptom onset. Neutralisation tests correlated well with each other and moderately well with S1 ELISA. Moreover to compare antigenic similarity of genetically diverse MERS-CoV clades, the response of four sera from two patients sampled at two time periods during the course of illness were tested by 90% PRNT. Genetically diverse MERS-CoV clades were antigenically homogenous.
机译:使用来自17位患者的95份血清,比较了噬斑减少中和测试(PRNT),微量中和(MN),中东呼吸综合征(MERS)-穗假颗粒中和(ppNT)和MERS S1酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)抗体滴度。 MERS,在症状发作后2至46天收集。中和测试之间的相关性很好,而S1 ELISA的相关性中等。此外,为了比较遗传多样性的MERS-CoV进化枝的抗原相似性,还用90%PRNT测试了在病程中两个时间段采样的两名患者的四个血清的反应。遗传多样性的MERS-CoV进化枝是抗原同源的。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号