...
首页> 外文期刊>European spine journal >A systematic review on the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for chronic non-specific low-back pain
【24h】

A systematic review on the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for chronic non-specific low-back pain

机译:药物治疗对慢性非特异性下腰痛的有效性的系统评价

获取原文
           

摘要

The objective of this review was to determine the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions [i.e., non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), muscle relaxants, antidepressants, and opioids] for non-specific chronic low-back pain (LBP). Existing Cochrane reviews for the four interventions were screened for studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Then, the literature searches were updated. Only randomized controlled trials on adults (≥18?years) with chronic (≥12?weeks) non-specific LBP and evaluation of at least one of the main clinically relevant outcome measures (pain, functional status, perceived recovery, or return to work) were included. The GRADE approach was used to determine the quality of evidence. A total of 17 randomized controlled trials was included: NSAIDs (n?=?4), antidepressants (n?=?5), and opioids (n?=?8). No studies were found for muscle relaxants; 14 studies had a low risk of bias. The studies only reported effects on the short term (3?months). The overall quality of the evidence was low. NSAIDs and opioids seem to lead to a somewhat higher relief in pain on the short term, as compared to placebo, in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain; opioids seem to have a small effect in improving function for a selection of patients who responded with an exacerbation of their symptoms after stopping their medication. However, both types of medication show more adverse effects than placebo. There seems to be no difference in effect between antidepressants and placebo in patients with non-specific chronic LBP...
机译:这篇综述的目的是确定针对非特异性慢性腰背痛(LBP)的药物干预措施[即非甾体类抗炎药(NSAID),肌肉松弛剂,抗抑郁药和阿片类药物]的有效性。筛选了四种干预措施的现有Cochrane评价,以寻找符合纳入标准的研究。然后,文献检索被更新。仅针对成年人(≥18岁)患有慢性(≥12周)非特异性LBP的随机对照试验,并评估至少一项主要的临床相关结局指标(疼痛,功能状态,知觉恢复或恢复工作) )。 GRADE方法用于确定证据的质量。总共包括17项随机对照试验:NSAIDs(n?=?4),抗抑郁药(n?=?5)和阿片类药物(n?=?8)。尚未发现肌肉松弛剂的研究。 14项研究的偏倚风险低。这些研究仅报告了对短期(<3个月)的影响。证据的总体质量很低。与安慰剂相比,非特异性慢性下腰痛患者在短期内使用非甾体抗炎药和阿片类药物可减轻疼痛。对于选择在停药后症状加重的患者,阿片类药物似乎在改善功能方面作用不大。但是,两种药物都比安慰剂显示出更多的不良反应。对于非特异性慢性LBP患者,抗抑郁药和安慰剂之间的作用似乎没有差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号