首页> 外文期刊>European spine journal >Laminoplasty and laminectomy for cervical sponydylotic myelopathy: a systematic review
【24h】

Laminoplasty and laminectomy for cervical sponydylotic myelopathy: a systematic review

机译:椎板成形术和椎板切除术治疗颈椎病型脊髓病:系统评价

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundCervical spondylotic myelopathy is frequently encountered in neurosurgical practice. The posterior surgical approach includes laminectomy and laminoplasty.ObjectiveTo perform a systematic review evaluating the effectiveness of posterior laminectomy compared with posterior laminoplasty for patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.MethodsAn extensive search of the literature in Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane library was performed by an experienced librarian. Risk of bias was assessed by two authors independently. The quality of the studies was graded, and the following outcome measures were retrieved: pre- and postoperative (m)JOA, pre- and postoperative ROM, postoperative VAS neck pain, and Ishira cervical curvature index. If possible data were pooled, otherwise a weighted mean was calculated for each study and a range mentioned.ResultsAll studies were of very low quality. Due to inadequate description of the data in most articles, pooling of the data was not possible. Qualitative interpretation of the data learned that there were no clinically important differences, except for the higher rate of procedure-related complications with laminoplasty.ConclusionBased on these results, a claim of superiority for laminoplasty or laminectomy was not justified. The higher number of procedure-related complications should be considered when laminoplasty is offered to a patient as a treatment option. A study of robust methodological design is warranted to provide objective data on the clinical effectiveness of both procedures. ..
机译:背景在神经外科实践中经常遇到颈椎病性脊髓病。后路手术方法包括椎板切除术和椎板隆突成形术。目的进行系统评价以评价后椎板切除术与后椎板隆突成形术对颈椎病性脊髓病的疗效。方法馆员。两名作者分别评估了偏倚风险。对研究质量进行分级,并检索以下结局指标:术前和术后(m)JOA,术前和术后ROM,术后VAS颈部疼痛和Ishira颈椎曲度指数。如果汇总了可能的数据,则为每项研究计算加权平均值,并提及范围。结果所有研究的质量都非常低。由于大多数文章中对数据的描述不足,因此无法汇总数据。对数据的定性解释表明,除了与手术相关的椎板成形术并发症发生率较高以外,没有临床上的重要差异。结论基于这些结果,没有理由主张椎板成形术或椎板切除术具有优越性。当为患者提供椎板成形术作为治疗选择时,应考虑更多与手术相关的并发症。有必要对稳健的方法学设计进行研究,以提供有关两种手术的临床有效性的客观数据。 ..

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号