...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery. >Laminoplasty versus skip laminectomy for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A systematic review
【24h】

Laminoplasty versus skip laminectomy for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A systematic review

机译:椎板成形术vs跳过椎板切除术治疗多级颈椎病脊髓病:系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction: Laminoplasty and skip laminectomy are two specific posterior surgical approaches for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review comparing the clinical results and complications of laminoplasty and skip laminectomy in the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Materials and methods: We reviewed and analyzed papers published from January 1969 to December 2012 through the Mediline, Embase, Cochrane review library, and other databases regarding the comparison between laminoplasty and skip laminectomy for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Results: One randomized controlled trial and three non-randomized controlled trials were included in this systematic review. In three studies, the preoperative and postoperative JOA score was similar in both laminoplasty and skip laminectomy groups. In addition, for recovery rate, there was no significant difference between the groups. One study reported that, regarding SF12 scores, there was no significant difference in physical health and mental health after surgery. However, regarding cervical pain, the skip laminectomy group was better than the laminoplasty group significantly. No difference was presented in postoperative ROM and the cervical lordosis between the groups. But the ROM % (post/pre) was reported to be significantly better in the skip laminectomy group in three studies. Less blood loss and shorter operation time were observed in skip laminectomy rather than laminoplasty. Conclusions: Based on the results above, the skip laminectomy group presented better outcomes in a variety of aspects: ROM % (post/pre), complication rate, surgical trauma, etc. However, as limited study samples were included in the paper, a claim of superiority of the two approaches could not be justified. Further studies are required on the comparison between laminoplasty and skip laminectomy.
机译:简介:椎板成形术和跳过椎板切除术是治疗多发性颈椎病脊髓病的两种特定的后路手术方法。这项研究的目的是进行系统评价,比较椎板成形术和跳过椎板切除术治疗多发性颈椎病脊髓病的临床结果和并发症。材料和方法:我们对Mediline,Embase,Cochrane评估库和其他数据库中从1969年1月至2012年12月发表的论文进行了分析,这些文献涉及椎板成形术和跳过椎板切除术用于多级颈椎病脊髓病的比较。结果:这项系统评价包括一项随机对照试验和三项非随机对照试验。在三项研究中,椎板成形术组和跳过椎板切除术组的术前和术后JOA评分相似。此外,在恢复率方面,两组之间没有显着差异。一项研究报告,就SF12评分而言,手术后的身体健康和心理健康没有显着差异。但是,就宫颈疼痛而言,跳过椎板切除术组明显优于椎板成形术组。两组之间的术后ROM和颈椎前凸没有差异。但是,在三项研究中,在跳过椎板切除术组中,ROM%(术后/前)显着改善。在跳过椎板切除术而不是椎板成形术中,出血量更少,手术时间更短。结论:基于以上结果,跳过椎板切除术组在以下多个方面均表现出更好的结局:ROM%(术后/术后),并发症发生率,手术创伤等。但是,由于本文包括的研究样本有限,因此声称这两种方法具有优势是没有道理的。椎板成形术和跳过椎板切除术之间的比较需要进一步的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号