首页> 外文期刊>EnvironmentAsia >Comparison and Evaluation of Different Leachate Treatment Processes forChemical Oxygen Demand and Color Removals - Statistical Assessment
【24h】

Comparison and Evaluation of Different Leachate Treatment Processes forChemical Oxygen Demand and Color Removals - Statistical Assessment

机译:化学需氧量和脱色不同渗滤液处理工艺的比较和评估-统计评估

获取原文
           

摘要

The performance of seven oxidation treatments on stabilized landfill leachate namely; O 3 , Fen-ton, Fenton followed by O 3 , persulfate, persulfate followed by O 3 , simultaneous O 3 /Fenton, andsimultaneous O 3 /persulfate were evaluated and compared. The study aims to assess the variationbetween all the seven oxidation treatments with regards to COD and color removal. The analysisof variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s test showed that there were significant differences between theperformances of the treatments. The O 3 treatment removed the lowest COD and color while thesimultaneous O 3 /Fenton, Fenton followed by O 3 , simultaneous O 3 /persulfate and persulfate fol-lowed by O 3 removed the highest. Hence, these treatments are recommended to remove organicsfrom stabilized landfill leachate.
机译:在稳定的垃圾渗滤液中进行七种氧化处理的性能;评估并比较了O 3,芬顿,Fenton,然后是O 3,过硫酸盐,过硫酸盐,然后是O 3,同时存在O 3 / Fenton和同时存在的O 3 /过硫酸盐。该研究旨在评估在COD和脱色方面,所有七个氧化处理之间的差异。方差分析(ANOVA)和Tukey检验表明,治疗效果之间存在显着差异。 O 3处理去除了最低的COD和颜色,而同时O 3 / Fenton,Fenton随后是O 3,同时O 3 /过硫酸盐和过硫酸盐被O 3去除了最高。因此,建议采用这些处理方法从稳定的垃圾填埋场渗滤液中去除有机物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号