首页> 外文期刊>European spine journal >Polyurethane on titanium unconstrained disc arthroplasty versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical disc disease: a review of level I–II randomized clinical trials including clinical outcomes
【24h】

Polyurethane on titanium unconstrained disc arthroplasty versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical disc disease: a review of level I–II randomized clinical trials including clinical outcomes

机译:聚氨酯在钛合金无约束椎间盘置换术与前路椎间盘切除术和融合术治疗颈椎间盘疾病:I–II级随机临床试验(包括临床结果)的综述

获取原文
           

摘要

PurposeTo contrast the clinical and radiologic outcomes and adverse events of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with a single cervical disc arthroplasty design, the polyurethane on titanium unconstrained cervical disc (PTUCD).MethodsThis is a systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCT) with evidence level I–II reporting clinical outcomes. After a search on different databases including PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Ovid MEDLINE, a total of 10 RCTs out of 51 studies found were entered in the study. RTCs were searched from the earliest available records in 2005 to November 2014.ResultsOut of a total of 1101 patients, 562 were randomly assigned into the PTUCD arthroplasty group and 539 into the ACDF group. The mean follow-up was 30.9?months. Patients undergoing arthroplasty had lower Neck Disability Index, and better SF-36 Physical component scores than ACDF patients. Patients with PTUCD arthroplasty had also less radiological degenerative changes at the upper adjacent level. Overall adverse events were twice more frequent in patients with ACDF. The rate of revision surgery including both adjacent and index level was slightly higher in patients with ACDF, showing no statistically significant difference.ConclusionsAccording to this review, PTUCD arthroplasty showed a global superiority to ACDF in clinical outcomes. The impact of both surgical techniques on the cervical spine (radiological spine deterioration and/or complications) was more severe in patients undergoing ACDF. However, the rate of revision surgeries at any cervical level was equivalent for ACDF and PTUCD arthroplasty...
机译:目的为了对比单颈椎间盘置换术设计的颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合术(ACDF)的临床和放射学结果以及不良事件,采用无约束钛钛颈椎间盘(PTUCD)上的聚氨酯。具有I–II级证据报告临床结果。在对不同数据库(包括PubMed,Cochrane对照试验中央注册和Ovid MEDLINE)进行搜索之后,共找到了51项研究中的10项RCT。从2005年至2014年11月的最早记录中搜索RTC,结果在1101例患者中,随机将562例归入PTUCD置换组,将539例归入ACDF组。平均随访30.9个月。与ACDF患者相比,接受关节置换术的患者的颈部残疾指数更低,SF-36物理成分得分更高。 PTUCD关节置换术患者在上相邻水平的放射学退行性改变也较少。 ACDF患者的总体不良事件发生频率是其两倍。 ACDF患者的翻修手术率(包括邻位和指标水平)略高,无统计学差异。结论根据本评价,PTUCD关节置换术在临床结局方面显示出优于ACDF的优势。在接受ACDF的患者中,两种手术技术对颈椎的影响(放射学脊柱恶化和/或并发症)都更为严重。但是,任何颈椎水平的翻修手术率都相当于ACDF和PTUCD关节置换术...

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号