首页> 外文期刊>European journal of endocrinology >Gestational age-specific reference ranges from different laboratories misclassify pregnant women's thyroid status: comparison of two longitudinal prospective cohort studies
【24h】

Gestational age-specific reference ranges from different laboratories misclassify pregnant women's thyroid status: comparison of two longitudinal prospective cohort studies

机译:来自不同实验室的妊娠期特定参考范围对孕妇的甲状腺状况进行了错误分类:两项纵向前瞻性队列研究的比较

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

ObjectivesCorrect interpretation of thyroid status during pregnancy is vital to secure fetal development. Pregnancy-related changes in maternal thyroid status necessitate the use of gestational age-specific reference ranges. In this study, we investigated between-laboratory reproducibility of thyroid reference ranges in pregnant women.DesignComparison of two longitudinal prospective cohort studies including 255 (cohort 1) and 101 (cohort 2) healthy antibody-negative Danish pregnant women attending prenatal care at Copenhagen University Hospital.MethodsDifferent immunoassays were used to measure thyroid hormone levels in the two cohorts. Thyroid hormone reference ranges were established for every 5 weeks of gestation. Differences between cohorts were explored through mixed-model repeated measures regression analyses. By applying reference ranges from one cohort to the other, the proportion of women who would be misclassified by doing so was investigated.ResultsTSH increased and free thyroxine (FT_(4)) decreased as pregnancy progressed. Results indicated highly significant differences between cohorts in free triiodothyronine ( F =21.3, P <0.001) and FT_(4) ( F =941, P <0.001). TSH levels were comparable ( P =0.09). Up to 90.3% of the women had FT_(4) levels outside their laboratory's nonpregnant reference range, and up to 100% outside the other cohort's gestational-age-specific reference ranges. Z -score-based reference ranges markedly improved comparison between cohorts.ConclusionEven in the same region, the use of gestational-age-specific reference ranges from different laboratories led to misclassification. Up to 100% of maternal FT_(4) levels fell outside the other cohort's reference range despite similar TSH levels. In clinical practice, thyroid testing of pregnant women without adding method specificity to gestational age-dependent reference ranges will compromise patient safety.
机译:目的正确解释怀孕期间甲状腺的状况对于确保胎儿发育至关重要。孕妇甲状腺状况的妊娠相关变化有必要使用特定于胎龄的参考范围。在这项研究中,我们研究了孕妇甲状腺参考范围在实验室之间的可重复性。两项纵向前瞻性队列研究的设计比较,包括255名(健康队列1)和101名(健康队列)阴性的健康丹麦阴性孕妇在哥本哈根大学接受产前检查。方法采用不同的免疫分析方法测量两个队列中的甲状腺激素水平。每妊娠5周建立一次甲状腺激素参考范围。通过混合模型重复测量回归分析探索了队列之间的差异。通过应用一个人群至另一个人群的参考范围,调查了将被错误分类的女性比例。结果随着怀孕的进行,TSH升高,游离甲状腺素(FT_(4))降低。结果表明,在游离三碘甲状腺氨酸(F = 21.3,P <0.001)和FT_(4)(F = 941,P <0.001)的队列之间存在显着差异。 TSH水平相当(P = 0.09)。高达90.3%的妇女的FT_(4)水平超出了实验室的非妊娠参考范围,而其他队列特定于妊娠年龄的参考范围则高达100%。基于Z评分的参考范围显着改善了队列之间的比较。结论即使在同一地区,不同实验室使用的特定于胎龄的参考范围也会导致分类错误。尽管TSH水平相似,但高达100%的孕妇FT_(4)水平仍超出了其他队列的参考范围。在临床实践中,对孕妇进行甲状腺测试而未将方法的特异性添加到与胎龄有关的参考范围内,则会损害患者的安全性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号