首页> 外文期刊>ESC Heart Failure >Prognostic performance of serial in‐hospital measurements of copeptin and multiple novel biomarkers among patients with worsening heart failure: results from the MOLITOR study
【24h】

Prognostic performance of serial in‐hospital measurements of copeptin and multiple novel biomarkers among patients with worsening heart failure: results from the MOLITOR study

机译:心力衰竭加重患者连续肽蛋白和多种新生物标志物的院内连续测量的预后性能:MOLITOR研究的结果

获取原文
           

摘要

Aims In heart failure, various biomarkers are established for diagnosis and risk stratification; however, little is known about the relevance of serial measurements during an episode worsening heart failure (WHF). This study sought to investigate the trajectory of natriuretic peptides and multiple novel biomarkers during hospitalization for WHF and to determine the best time point to predict outcome. Methods and results MOLITOR (Impact of Therapy Optimisation on the Level of Biomarkers in Patients with Acute and Decompensated Chronic Heart Failure) was an eight‐centre prospective study of 164 patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of WHF. C‐terminal fragment of pre‐pro‐vasopressin (copeptin), N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP), mid‐regional pro‐atrial natriuretic peptide (MR‐proANP), mid‐regional pro‐adrenomedullin (MR‐proADM), and C‐terminal pro‐endothelin‐1 (CT‐proET1) were measured on admission, after 24, 48, and 72?h, and every 72?h thereafter, at discharge and follow‐up visits. Their performance to predict all‐cause mortality and rehospitalization at 90?days was compared. All biomarkers decreased during recompensation ( P ??0.05) except MR‐proADM. Copeptin at admission was the best predictor of 90?day mortality or rehospitalization ( χ 2 ?=?16.63, C ‐index?=?0.724, P ??0.001), followed by NT‐proBNP ( χ 2 ?=?10.53, C ‐index?=?0.646, P ?=?0.001), MR‐proADM ( χ 2 ?=?9.29, C ‐index?=?0.686, P ?=?0.002), MR‐proANP ( χ 2 ?=?8.75, C ‐index?=?0.631, P ?=?0.003), and CT‐proET1 ( χ 2 ?=?6.60, C ‐index?=?0.64, P ?=?0.010). Re‐measurement of copeptin at 72?h and of NT‐proBNP at 48?h increased prognostic value ( χ 2 ?=?23.48, C ‐index?=?0.718, P ?=?0.00001; χ 2 ?=?14.23, C ‐index?=?0.650, P ?=?0.00081, respectively). Conclusions This largest sample of serial measurements of multiple biomarkers in WHF found copeptin at admission with re‐measurement at 72?h to be the best predictor of 90?day mortality and rehospitalization.
机译:目的在心力衰竭中,建立了各种生物标志物用于诊断和风险分层。然而,关于心力衰竭(WHF)恶化发作期间串行测量的相关性了解甚少。这项研究试图调查住院期间利尿钠肽和多种新型生物标志物的轨迹,并确定预测结果的最佳时间点。方法和结果MOLITOR(治疗优化对慢性和失代偿性慢性心力衰竭患者生物标志物水平的影响)是一项对164例最初诊断为WHF住院患者的8中心前瞻性研究。前加压素(肽素)的C末端片段,N末端B型利尿钠肽(NT-proBNP),中部区域心房利钠肽(MR-proANP),中部区域肾上腺髓质素(MR-proADM)和C端内皮素-1(CT-proET1)在入院后24、48和72?h以及之后的每72?h,出院和随访时进行测量。比较了他们预测90天全因死亡率和再次住院的效果。除MR-proADM以外,所有生物标志物在补偿期间均降低(P 0.05)。入院时copeptin是90天死亡率或住院治疗的最佳预测指标(χ2?=?16.63,C-index?=?0.724,P?<?0.001),其次是NT-proBNP(χ2?=?10.53, C-指数≥0.646,P = 0.001),MR-proADM(χ2 = 9.29,C-指数= 0.686,P = 0.002,P≥0.002),MR-proANP(χ2 == 0.002)。 C指数为8.75,C指数= 0.631,P = 0.003)和CT-proET1(χ2指数= 6.60,C指数= 0.64,P = 0.010)。在72?h时重新测量肽素和在48?h时重新测量NT-proBNP会增加预后价值(χ2 = 23.48,C指数= 0.718,P = 0.00001;χ2 = 14.23, C指数?=?0.650,P?=?0.00081)。结论该最大系列的WHF中多种生物标志物的连续测量样本发现入院时肽素和72?h的重新测量是90天死亡率和住院治疗的最佳预测指标。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号