...
首页> 外文期刊>ESAIM: Proceedings and Surveys >A comparative study between kriging and adaptive sparse tensor-product methods for multi-dimensional approximation problems in aerodynamics design
【24h】

A comparative study between kriging and adaptive sparse tensor-product methods for multi-dimensional approximation problems in aerodynamics design

机译:空气动力学设计中多维逼近问题的克里金法和自适应稀疏张量积方法的比较研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The performances of two multivariate interpolation procedures are compared using functions that are either synthetic or coming from a shape optimization problem in aerodynamics. The aim is to evaluate the efficiency of adaptive sparse interpolation algorithms 2 and compare them with the kriging approach developed for the design and analysis of computer experiment (DACE) 21. The accuracy and computational time of the two methods are examined as the number N of samples used in the interpolation increases. It appears in our test cases that both methods perform equivalently, in terms of precision. However, as the dimension d increases, the computational time involved in the enrichement of the kriging sample becomes intractable for large values of N. This problem is circumvented in the case of the sparse interpolation procedure for which the computational time scales linearly with N and d.
机译:使用合成函数或来自空气动力学形状优化问题的函数比较了两个多元插值过程的性能。目的是评估自适应稀疏插值算法2的效率,并将其与为计算机实验(DACE)21的设计和分析而开发的kriging方法进行比较。将这两种方法的准确性和计算时间作为N的数量N进行检验。插值中使用的样本增加。在我们的测试案例中,就精度而言,这两种方法似乎表现相同。但是,随着维数d的增加,对于较大的N值,克里格样本的富集所涉及的计算时间变得棘手。在稀疏插值过程中,该问题的计算时间与N和d成线性比例,从而避免了此问题。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号