首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source >Kriged and modeled ambient air levels of benzene in an urban environment: an exposure assessment study
【24h】

Kriged and modeled ambient air levels of benzene in an urban environment: an exposure assessment study

机译:克里格模型和城市环境中苯的环境空气建模:暴露评估研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Background There is increasing concern regarding the potential adverse health effects of air pollution, particularly hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). However, quantifying exposure to these pollutants is problematic. Objective Our goal was to explore the utility of kriging, a spatial interpolation method, for exposure assessment in epidemiologic studies of HAPs. We used benzene as an example and compared census tract-level kriged predictions to estimates obtained from the 1999 U.S. EPA National Air Toxics Assessment (NATA), Assessment System for Population Exposure Nationwide (ASPEN) model. Methods Kriged predictions were generated for 649 census tracts in Harris County, Texas using estimates of annual benzene air concentrations from 17 monitoring sites operating in Harris and surrounding counties from 1998 to 2000. Year 1999 ASPEN modeled estimates were also obtained for each census tract. Spearman rank correlation analyses were performed on the modeled and kriged benzene levels. Weighted kappa statistics were computed to assess agreement between discretized kriged and modeled estimates of ambient air levels of benzene. Results There was modest correlation between the predicted and modeled values across census tracts. Overall, 56.2%, 40.7%, 31.5% and 28.2% of census tracts were classified as having 'low', 'medium-low', 'medium-high' and 'high' ambient air levels of benzene, respectively, comparing predicted and modeled benzene levels. The weighted kappa statistic was 0.26 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.20, 0.31), indicating poor agreement between the two methods. Conclusions There was a lack of concordance between predicted and modeled ambient air levels of benzene. Applying methods of spatial interpolation for assessing exposure to ambient air pollutants in health effect studies is hindered by the placement and number of existing stationary monitors collecting HAP data. Routine monitoring needs to be expanded if we are to use these data to better assess environmental health risks in the future.
机译:背景技术人们越来越关注空气污染,特别是有害空气污染物(HAP)的潜在健康危害。但是,量化这些污染物的暴露量是有问题的。目的我们的目标是探索空间插值方法克里金法在HAP流行病学研究中的暴露评估的实用性。我们以苯为例,将人口普查区域的kriged预测与从1999年美国EPA国家空气毒性评估(NATA),全国人口暴露评估系统(ASPEN)模型获得的估计值进行了比较。方法使用1998年至2000年哈里斯及其周边县17个监测点的年度苯空气浓度估算值,对得克萨斯州哈里斯县的649个普查区进行了Kriged预测。1999年还为每个普查区获得了ASPEN建模的估算值。 Spearman等级相关分析是在模拟和克氏苯水平上进行的。计算加权κ统计量以评估离散克里金法和模型化苯环境空气水平估计值之间的一致性。结果普查范围内的预测值与模型值之间存在适度的相关性。总体上,分别比较了56.2%,40.7%,31.5%和28.2%的普查区域的苯的“低”,“中-低”,“中-高”和“高”环境空气水平。模拟苯水平。加权kappa统计量为0.26(95%置信区间(CI)= 0.20,0.31),表明这两种方法之间的一致性较差。结论预测的和模拟的环境空气中苯之间缺乏一致性。空间插值方法在健康影响研究中评估周围空气污染物暴露的应用方法受到现有HAP数据的固定监测仪的放置和数量的限制。如果我们要使用这些数据来更好地评估未来的环境健康风险,则需要扩大常规监测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号