...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source >Comparison of emergency department and hospital admissions data for air pollution time-series studies
【24h】

Comparison of emergency department and hospital admissions data for air pollution time-series studies

机译:急诊科和医院入院数据的空气污染时间序列研究比较

获取原文

摘要

Background Emergency department (ED) visit and hospital admissions (HA) data have been an indispensible resource for assessing acute morbidity impacts of air pollution. ED visits and HAs are types of health care visits with similarities, but also potentially important differences. Little previous information is available regarding the impact of health care visit type on observed acute air pollution-health associations from studies conducted for the same location, time period, outcome definitions and model specifications. Methods As part of a broader study of air pollution and health in St. Louis, individual-level ED and HA data were obtained for a 6.5?year period for acute care hospitals in the eight Missouri counties of the St. Louis metropolitan area. Patient demographic characteristics and diagnostic code distributions were compared for four visit types including ED visits, HAs, HAs that came through the ED, and non-elective HAs. Time-series analyses of the relationship between daily ambient ozone and PM2.5 and selected cardiorespiratory outcomes were conducted for each visit type. Results Our results indicate that, compared with ED patients, HA patients tended to be older, had evidence of greater severity for some outcomes, and had a different mix of specific outcomes. Consideration of ‘HA through ED’ appeared to more effectively select acute visits than consideration of ‘non-elective HA’. While outcomes with the strongest observed temporal associations with air pollutants tended to show strong associations for all visit types, we found some differences in observed associations for ED visits and HAs. For example, risk ratios for the respiratory disease-ozone association were 1.020 for ED visits and 1.004 for ‘HA through ED’; risk ratios for the asthma/wheeze-ozone association were 1.069 for ED visits and 1.106 for ‘HA through ED’. Several factors (e.g. age) were identified that may be responsible, in part, for the differences in observed associations. Conclusions Demographic and diagnostic differences between visit types may lead to preference for one visit type over another for some questions and populations. The strengths of observed associations with air pollutants sometimes varied between different health care visit types, but the relative strengths of association generally were specific to the pollutant-outcome combination.
机译:背景技术急诊科(ED)的访问和医院入院(HA)数据已成为评估空气污染对急性发病影响的必不可少的资源。急诊就诊和医管局是既有相似之处,又有潜在重要差异的卫生保健就诊类型。以前很少有关于就诊地点,时间段,结果定义和模型规范进行的研究有关就诊类型对观察到的急性空气污染与健康的关系的信息。方法作为对圣路易斯市空气污染和健康的更广泛研究的一部分,在密苏里州圣路易斯市八个县的急症医院中,获得了6.5年的个人水平ED和HA数据。比较了四种就诊类型的患者人口统计学特征和诊断代码分布,包括急诊就诊,医管局,通过急诊科就诊的医管局和非选择性医管局。对每种就诊类型进行了每日环境臭氧和PM2.5与选定的心肺转归之间关系的时间序列分析。结果我们的结果表明,与ED患者相比,HA患者倾向于年龄更大,证据表明某些结果的严重性更高,并且特定结果的组合也有所不同。与考虑“非选修性HA”相比,考虑“通过ED进行HA”似乎更有效地选择了急诊就诊。尽管观察到的与空气污染物的时间相关性最强的结果往往显示出对所有访问类型的强相关性,但我们发现对ED访问和HA的观察到的相关性存在一些差异。例如,急诊就诊时呼吸道疾病与臭氧的关联风险比为1.020,“通过急诊通过医管局”为1.004;急诊就诊的哮喘/喘息臭氧关联的风险比为1.069,“通过急诊通过HA”的风险比为1.106。确定了一些因素(例如年龄),部分原因可能是观察到的联想差异。结论在某些问题和人群中,就诊类型之间的人口统计学和诊断差异可能导致偏爱一种就诊类型。在不同的卫生保健就诊类型之间,观察到的与空气污染物的关联强度有时会有所不同,但关联的相对强度通常特定于污染物与污染物的组合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号