...
首页> 外文期刊>Engineering Economics >Multi-criteria Optimization System for Decision Making in Construction Design and Management
【24h】

Multi-criteria Optimization System for Decision Making in Construction Design and Management

机译:建筑设计与管理决策的多准则优化系统

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

All new ideas and possible variants of decisions mustbe compared according to many criteria. The complexnature of decision-making requires practitioners to selectinvestment options based on a wider variety of policyconsiderations in addition to cost benefit analysis and puretechnical considerations. In economics and decisionmaking it is essential to be able to take into account theimpacts of cultural, social, moral, legislative, demographic,economic, environmental, governmental and technologicalchange, as well as changes in the business world oninternational, national, regional and local markets. Costbenefit analysis approach is a useful tool for investmentdecision-making from an economic perspective. Cautionsshould also be given to the methods of determining thevalue of social and local interests. Some socialexternalities, such as employment and regional economicimpacts, are generally omitted in current practices.Current practices tend to use cardinal or ordinal scales inmeasure in non-monetized criteria. The use of unreasonablemonetization methods in some cases has discredited costbenefit analysis in the eyes of decision makers and thepublic. It may be appropriate to consider these externalities inqualitative forms in a multi-criteria analysis. Multi-criteriadecision making is used in various areas of humanactivities. The Criteria can be qualitative and quantitative.They usually have different units of measurement anddiffer in optimization direction. The normalization aims atobtaining comparable scales of criteria values. In the newversion of the program LEVI 4 the normalization methodsare including vector, linear scale, non-linear and newlogarithmic techniques may be used. This softwareconsiders the main aspects of two-sided game problems.The following strategic principles are used: Wald's rule,Savage criterion, Hurwicz's rule, Laplace's rule, Bayes'srule and Hodges-Lehmann rule. This program isdemonstrated by considering a real case study involving 4evaluation criteria of the currently used external walls ofindividual residential buildings.
机译:必须根据许多标准比较所有新想法和可能的决策变体。决策的复杂性要求从业人员除了成本收益分析和纯技术方面的考虑外,还应根据更广泛的政策考虑选择投资方案。在经济学和决策中,必须考虑到文化,社会,道德,立法,人口,经济,环境,政府和技术的变化以及商业世界对国际,国家,地区和地方市场的变化的影响。从经济角度来看,成本效益分析方法是进行投资决策的有用工具。还应注意确定社会和地方利益价值的方法。当前的实践中通常会忽略一些社会外部因素,例如就业和区域经济影响。当前的实践倾向于在非货币化标准中使用基数或序数量表进行度量。在某些情况下,使用不合理的货币化方法在决策者和公众看来已经丧失了成本效益分析能力。在多标准分析中考虑这些外部性定性形式可能是适当的。在人类活动的各个领域都采用了多准则决策。准则可以是定性和定量的。它们通常具有不同的度量单位,并且在优化方向上也有所不同。归一化旨在获得标准值的可比较规模。在LEVI 4程序的新版本中,可以使用归一化方法,包括矢量,线性标度,非线性和新对数技术。该软件考虑了双面博弈问题的主要方面。使用了以下战略原则:沃尔德法则,野蛮准则,胡维兹准则,拉普拉斯准则,贝叶斯规则和霍奇斯-莱曼规则。通过考虑涉及4个评估标准的实际案例来演示该程序,这些评估标准是当前对单个住宅建筑物的外墙的使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号