首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Research Letters >Researching geoengineering: should not or could not?
【24h】

Researching geoengineering: should not or could not?

机译:研究地球工程:应该还是应该?

获取原文
           

摘要

Is geoengineering a feasible, sensible, or practical stopgap measure for us to have in our arsenal of potential responses to global warming? We do not know at this point and so it seems hardly contentious to claim that we should find out. I evaluate a moral argument that we should not try to find out and a methodological argument that even if we try, we cannot find out. I reject the first but end up as agnostic on the second, outlining the burden of proof that it creates for proponents of geoengineering research.
机译:对于我们在应对全球变暖的潜在对策中,地球工程是否是可行,合理或实际的权宜之计?我们目前还不知道,因此声称我们应该找出答案似乎几乎没有争议。我评估了一种我们不应该试图发现的道德论据,以及一种即使我们尝试也无法发现的方法论论据。我拒绝第一个,但最后却对第二个不可知,概述了它为地球工程研究的支持者带来的举证责任。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号