首页> 外文期刊>Endocrine journal >Inverse agonism: the classic concept of GPCRs revisited [Review]
【24h】

Inverse agonism: the classic concept of GPCRs revisited [Review]

机译:反向激动:重新审视GPCR的经典概念[评论]

获取原文
       

摘要

References(59) In the classical two-state model, G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are considered to exist in equilibrium between an active and an inactive conformation. Thus, even at the resting state, some subpopulation of GPCRs is in the active state, which underlies the basal activity of the GPCRs. In this review, we discuss inverse agonists, which are defined as GPCR ligands that shift the equilibrium toward the inactive state and thereby suppress the basal activity. Theoretically, if constitutive activation plays an essential role in the pathogenesis of a disease, only inverse agonists, and not neutral antagonists, can reverse this pathophysiological activation. Although many pharmacological examples of inverse agonism have been identified, its clinical importance is still unclear and debated. Thus, even though inverse agonism of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) has been discussed for more than 10 years, its clinical relevance remains to be completely clarified.
机译:参考文献(59)在经典的两态模型中,G蛋白偶联受体(GPCR)被认为存在于活性和非活性构象之间的平衡中。因此,即使在静止状态下,GPCR的一些亚群仍处于活跃状态,这是GPCR的基础活性的基础。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了反向激动剂,其定义为GPCR配体,其将平衡移向非活性状态,从而抑制了基础活性。从理论上讲,如果组成性激活在疾病的发病机理中起重要作用,则只有反向激动剂而非中性拮抗剂才能逆转这种病理生理学激活。尽管已经确定了反向激动剂的许多药理学实例,但其临床重要性仍不清楚并存在争议。因此,尽管已经讨论了血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARBs)的反向激动作用已超过十年,但其临床意义仍有待完全阐明。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号