...
首页> 外文期刊>Endoscopy International Open >Effectiveness and safety of serial endoscopic ultrasound–guided celiac plexus block for chronic pancreatitis
【24h】

Effectiveness and safety of serial endoscopic ultrasound–guided celiac plexus block for chronic pancreatitis

机译:内镜超声引导下腹腔神经丛阻滞治疗慢性胰腺炎的有效性和安全性

获取原文

摘要

Background and study aims: Endoscopic ultrasound?–?guided celiac plexus block (EUS-CPB) is an established treatment for pain in patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP), but the effectiveness and safety of repeated procedures are unknown. Our objective is to report our experience of repeated EUS-CPB procedures within a single patient. Patients and methods: A prospectively maintained EUS database was retrospectively analyzed to identify patients who had undergone more than one EUS-CPB procedure over a 17-year period. The main outcome measures included number of EUS-CPB procedures for each patient, self-reported pain relief, duration of pain relief, and procedure-related adverse events. Results: A total of 248 patients underwent more than one EUS-CPB procedure and were included in our study. Patients with known or suspected CP (N?=?248) underwent a mean (SD) of 3.1 (1.6) EUS-CPB procedures. In 76?% of the patients with CP, the median (range) duration of the response to the first EUS-CPB procedure was 10 (1?–?54) weeks. Lack of pain relief after the initial EUS-CPB was associated with failure of the next EUS-CPB (OR 0.17, 95?%CI 0.06?–?0.54). Older age at first EUS-CPB and pain relief after the first EUS-CPB were significantly associated with pain relief after subsequent blocks (P?=?0.026 and P?=?0.002, respectively). Adverse events included peri-procedural hypoxia (n?=?2) and hypotension (n?=?1) and post-procedural orthostasis (n?=?2) and diarrhea (n?=?4). No major adverse events occurred. Conclusions: Repeated EUS-CPB procedures in a single patient appear to be safe. Response to the first EUS-CPB is associated with response to subsequent blocks.
机译:背景和研究目的:内镜超声引导的腹腔神经丛阻滞(EUS-CPB)是慢性胰腺炎(CP)患者疼痛的既定治疗方法,但重复手术的有效性和安全性尚不清楚。我们的目标是报告我们在单个患者中重复进行EUS-CPB程序的经验。患者和方法:对前瞻性维护的EUS数据库进行回顾性分析,以识别在17年内经历了一项以上EUS-CPB手术的患者。主要结局指标包括每位患者进行EUS-CPB手术的次数,自我报告的疼痛缓解,疼痛缓解的持续时间以及与手术相关的不良事件。结果:总共248例患者接受了一项以上的EUS-CPB手术,被纳入我们的研究。患有已知或疑似CP(N?=?248)的患者接受3.1(1.6)EUS-CPB程序的平均(SD)。在76%的CP患者中,对首次EUS-CPB手术反应的中位(范围)持续时间为10(1?–?54)周。初次EUS-CPB术后疼痛减轻与下一个EUS-CPB失败相关(OR 0.17,95%CI 0.06?-?0.54)。首次EUS-CPB的年龄较大和首次EUS-CPB的疼痛缓解与随后的阻滞后的疼痛缓解显着相关(分别为P <= 0.026和P <= 0.002)。不良事件包括围手术期缺氧(n = 2)和低血压(n = 1),术后矫正(n = 2)和腹泻(n = 4)。没有发生重大不良事件。结论:在单例患者中重复进行EUS-CPB手术似乎是安全的。对第一个EUS-CPB的响应与对后续块的响应相关联。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号