首页> 外文期刊>Emergency Care Journal >Ventimask in exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and mild acidosis before starting with bilevel positive airway pressure
【24h】

Ventimask in exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and mild acidosis before starting with bilevel positive airway pressure

机译:在开始双水平气道正压通气之前,使用呼吸面罩加重慢性阻塞性肺疾病和轻度酸中毒

获取原文
       

摘要

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) during an episode of acute or acute on chronic respiratory failure due to infection present a special problem with regard to the relief of hypoxia. In a prospective, randomized, multicenter controlled trial, we evaluated the efficacy of oxygen delivery by Ventimask compared with Venturi mask in patients affected by exacerbation of COPD and mild acidosis before starting with non-invasive bilevel-positive airway pressure (PAP). The study involved 80 patients with exacerbation of COPD divided in two groups: Group A=40 patients randomized to Ventimask plus standard therapy and Group B=40 patients randomised to Ventury mask plus standard therapy. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the efficacy of oxygen therapy with Ventimask compared with Venturi mask in terms of avoiding the need for non-invasive bilevel-PAP during the 1st h and reducing PaCO2 retention. Twenty-five patients (62%) started with bilevel-PAP in Group A and 28 (70%) in Group B (not significant). There were no significant changes in arterial blood gases values between the two groups. In Group A, pH and PaCO2 were 7.32±0.11 and 68.5±13.6 mmHg at admission, and 7.33±0.05 and 64.8±4.9 mmHg after 1 h (not significant). In Group B, pH and PaCO2 were, respectively, 7.32±0.11 and 65.7±13.6 mmHg at admission, and 7.33±0.03 and 64.0±5.5 mmHg after 1 h (not significant). Our conclusion did not show any significant differences between the two oxygen masks delivery in terms of preventing the need of bilevel-PAP and reducing PaCO2, despite the trend towards a reduction of the utilization of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation was in favor of Ventimask.
机译:在急性期或因感染引起的慢性呼吸衰竭急性发作期间患有慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)的患者在缓解缺氧方面存在特殊问题。在一项前瞻性,随机,多中心对照试验中,我们评估了在无创双水平气道正压通气(PAP)开始之前,Ventimask与Venturi面罩相比在COPD恶化和轻度酸中毒患者中的氧气递送效果。该研究涉及80例COPD恶化患者,分为两组:A组= 40例接受Ventimask联合标准疗法的患者,B组= 40例接受Ventury面罩+标准疗法的患者。主要终点是评估在与Venturi面罩相比,Ventimask面罩进行氧气治疗的有效性,以避免在第一小时内需要无创双水平PAP并减少PaCO2保留。 A组中有25名患者(62%)开始使用双水平PAP,B组中有28名患者(70%)开始使用双水平-PAP(无显着性)。两组之间的动脉血气值无明显变化。在A组中,入院时的pH和PaCO 2为7.32±0.11和68.5±13.6mmHg,在1小时后为7.33±0.05和64.8±4.9mmHg(不显着)。在B组中,入院时的pH和PaCO2分别为7.32±0.11和65.7±13.6 mmHg,1 h后为7.33±0.03和64.0±5.5 mmHg(不显着)。尽管减少无创正压通气使用率的趋势倾向于使用Ventimask,但我们的结论并未显示出两种氧气面罩在预防双水平PAP和减少PaCO2方面的显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号