...
首页> 外文期刊>Electronic Journal of Biotechnology >Comparison of commercially-available RNA extraction methods for effective bacterial RNA isolation from milk spiked samples
【24h】

Comparison of commercially-available RNA extraction methods for effective bacterial RNA isolation from milk spiked samples

机译:商业上可用的RNA提取方法的比较,可从加奶样品中有效分离细菌RNA

获取原文

摘要

Nucleic-acid based methods for bacterial identification are extremely useful in diagnostic applications due to their specificity and sensitivity. However, they require an optimal purification of the target molecules. As part of the development of a new diagnostic method for the detection of bacterial RNA in cow milk, we have compared four commercially available RNA extraction kits for the isolation of bacterial RNA from spiked UHT milk samples. The kits were compared in terms of extraction efficiency and RNA purity using two bacterial species, the Gram negative Escherichia coli and the Gram positive Staphylococcus aureus. Two kits are based in silica-matrix extraction, and the other two in the guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. In our hands, the RNeasy Protect Bacteria Mini kit from QIAGEN was the best performing in terms of RNA yield, quality, reproducibility and consumable needs, under the conditions here described.
机译:基于核酸的细菌鉴定方法由于其特异性和敏感性而在诊断应用中非常有用。但是,它们需要对目标分子进行最佳纯化。作为开发一种用于检测牛奶中细菌RNA的新诊断方法的一部分,我们比较了四种商用RNA提取试剂盒,用于从加标的UHT牛奶样品中分离细菌RNA。使用两种细菌,革兰氏阴性大肠杆菌和革兰氏阳性金黄色葡萄球菌对试剂盒的提取效率和RNA纯度进行了比较。两个试剂盒用于硅胶基质萃取,另外两个试剂盒用于硫氰酸胍-苯酚-氯仿萃取。在我们描述的条件下,就RNA产量,质量,可再现性和消耗性需求而言,QIAGEN的RNeasy Protect Bacteria Mini试剂盒性能最好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号