...
首页> 外文期刊>Iranian red crescent medical journal >Transdermal Fentanyl Patches Versus Patient-Controlled Intravenous Morphine Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Management
【24h】

Transdermal Fentanyl Patches Versus Patient-Controlled Intravenous Morphine Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Management

机译:芬太尼透皮贴剂与患者控制的吗啡镇痛镇痛的对比

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Acute and severe pain is common in patients postoperatively and should be correctly managed. In the past years studies on preparing better postoperative pain control have resulted in development of postoperative pain management guidelines. Perhaps, one of the major improvements in managing postoperative pain is the development of the patient-controlled analgesia systems (PCA), especially through intra venous (IV), extradural and transdermal routes, which has resulted in marked improvements in acute postoperative pain management. Physicians administrate potent opioids for moderate to severe post-surgical pains. Morphine is the most commonly IV-PCA administrated analgesic. The fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system (fentanyl ITS) is also another efficient option for pain management. Objectives:: The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic effects of these two routine postoperative pain control systems. Patients and Methods:: We enrolled 281 patients (224 males, 57 females) in this blind randomized controlled clinical trial, who had undergone an orthopedic surgery, with the mean age of 33.91 ± 14.45 years. Patients were randomly divided into two groups; in group A patients received IV-morphine PCA pump and in group B fentanyl transdermal patches were attached on patients’ arms. The severity of the pain was registered according to Visual Analogue Scale in specially designed forms by pain-trained nurses in two steps; first after the surgery and next before the beginning of analgesic effects. After 24 hours, the pain score was assessed again. Results:: No significant difference was observed in mean pain intensity score at the first patient assessment. Mean pain intensity scores were also similar in both groups at the last measured time point (P > 0.05). Differential pain intensity scores, showing the impacts of analgesic system on the pain experience of the patients was also similar between fentanyl patches (6.48 ± 2.20) and morphine PCIA (6.40 ± 1.80). (P > 0.05) Mean patient satisfactory score (scale: 0–100) was also similar in both groups (P > 0.05). The percentage of patients, whose differential pain intensity scores at 24 hours reached our pain management goal was similar between fentanyl and morphine groups (P > 0.05). The percentage of patients with at least one adverse event was significantly higher in fentanyl group (P < 0.05). The most frequent adverse events were nausea, vomiting and itching. In none of the groups, no patient experienced serious adverse events related to the studied medications. Conclusions:: Although both pain killing therapeutic regimens are safe and effective for postoperative pain management, regarding the easy usage of the patches, lower risk of abuse and cost-effectiveness in the Iranian market, it is recommended for use in Iranian hospitals and trauma centers and in countries with similar socioeconomic situations.
机译:急性和严重疼痛在术后患者中很常见,应正确处理。在过去的几年中,有关准备更好的术后疼痛控制的研究导致了术后疼痛管理指南的发展。也许,管理术后疼痛的主要改进之一是患者控制镇痛系统(PCA)的发展,特别是通过静脉内(IV),硬膜外和透皮途径的发展,这导致了急性术后疼痛管理的显着改善。对于中度至重度的手术后疼痛,医师应使用有效的阿片类药物。吗啡是最常用的IV-PCA镇痛药。芬太尼离子电渗透皮系统(芬太尼ITS)也是疼痛治疗的另一种有效选择。目的:本研究的目的是比较这两种常规术后疼痛控制系统的镇痛效果。患者和方法:我们在该盲人随机对照临床试验中招募了281例患者(男224例,女57例),他们接受了整形外科手术,平均年龄为33.91±14.45岁。患者被随机分为两组。 A组患者接受静脉注射吗啡PCA泵,B组患者的手臂上贴有芬太尼透皮贴剂。疼痛的严重程度由经过培训的护士按照视觉模拟量表以特殊设计的形式进行登记,分两步进行:首先在手术后,然后在开始止痛之前。 24小时后,再次评估疼痛评分。结果:在首次患者评估中,平均疼痛强度评分未见明显差异。在最后一个测量时间点,两组的平均疼痛强度评分也相似(P> 0.05)。芬太尼贴剂(6.48±2.20)和吗啡PCIA(6.40±1.80)之间的差异性疼痛强度评分显示镇痛系统对患者疼痛体验的影响也相似。 (P> 0.05)两组患者的平均满意评分(等级:0-100)也相似(P> 0.05)。芬太尼和吗啡组之间在24小时时疼痛强度差异达到我们的疼痛控制目标的患者百分比相似(P> 0.05)。芬太尼组中至少发生一种不良事件的患者百分比显着更高(P <0.05)。最常见的不良反应是恶心,呕吐和瘙痒。在所有组中,没有患者经历与所研究药物有关的严重不良事件。结论:尽管两种止痛疗法对于术后疼痛的治疗都是安全有效的,但在伊朗市场上,由于易于使用的贴片,较低的滥用风险和成本效益,建议在伊朗的医院和创伤中心使用以及具有相似社会经济状况的国家/地区。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号