首页> 外文期刊>Iranian Journal of Radiology >COMPARISON OF 64-DETECTOR CT COLONOGRAPHY AND CONVENTIONAL COLONOSCOPY IN THE DETECTION OF COLORECTAL LESIONS
【24h】

COMPARISON OF 64-DETECTOR CT COLONOGRAPHY AND CONVENTIONAL COLONOSCOPY IN THE DETECTION OF COLORECTAL LESIONS

机译:64排CT CT结肠造影与常规结肠镜检查在结肠直肠病变中的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Colon cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in developed countries. The early detection of colorectal cancer using screening programs is important for managing early-stage colorectal cancers and polyps. Modalities that allow examination of the entire colon are conventional colonoscopy, double contrast barium enema examination and multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) colonography.Objectives: To compare CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy results and to evaluate the accuracy of CT colonography for detecting colorectal lesions.Patients and Methods: In a prospective study performed at Gastroenterology and Radiology Departments of Medical Faculty of Eskisehir Osmangazi University, CT colonography and colonoscopy results of 31 patients with family history of colorectal carcinoma, personal or family history of colorectal polyps, lower gastrointestinal tract bleeding, change in bowel habits, iron deficiency anemia and abdominal pain were compared. Regardless of the size, CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy findings for all the lesions were cross - tabulated and the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated. To assess the agreement between CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy examinations, the Kappa coefficient of agreementt was used. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS ver 15.0.Results: Regardless of the size, MDCT colonography showed 83% sensitivity and 95% specificity, with a positive predictive value of 95% and a negative predictive value of 83% for the detection of colorectal polyps and masses. MDCT colonography displayed 92% sensitivity and 95% specificity, with a positive predictive value of 92% and a negative predictive value of 95% for polyps 3 10 mm. For polyps between 6mm and 9 mm, MDCT colonography displayed 75% sensitivity and 100% specificity, with a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 90%. For polyps £ 5 mm MDCT colonography displayed 88% sensitivity and 100% specificity with a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 95%.Conclusions: CT colonography is a safe and minimally invasive technique, a valuable diagnostic tool for examining the entire colon and a good alternative compared to other colorectal cancer screening tests because of its high sensitivity values in colorectal lesions over 1 cm.
机译:背景:结肠癌是发达国家发病率和死亡率的主要原因。使用筛查程序及早发现大肠癌对于管理早期大肠癌和息肉很重要。常规结肠镜检查,双对比钡灌肠检查和多探测器计算机断层扫描(MDCT)结肠镜检查是检查整个结肠的方法。目的:比较CT结肠造影和常规结肠镜检查的结果,并评估CT结肠造影术检测结直肠病变的准确性患者和方法:在埃斯基谢希尔·奥斯曼加奇大学医学院胃肠病学和放射学系进行的一项前瞻性研究中,对31例结肠直肠癌家族史,个人或家族结肠直肠息肉史,下消化道出血患者进行了CT结肠造影和结肠镜检查,比较了排便习惯,缺铁性贫血和腹痛的变化。不论大小,将所有病变的CT结肠造影和常规结肠镜检查结果进行交叉列表,并计算敏感性,特异性以及阳性和阴性预测值。为了评估CT结肠造影与常规结肠镜检查之间的一致性,使用了Kappa一致性系数。通过SPSS ver 15.0进行统计分析。结果:无论大小,MDCT结肠造影显示83%的敏感性和95%的特异性,对于检测结直肠息肉和结肠癌的阳性预测值为95%,阴性预测值为83%。群众。 MDCT结肠造影显示92%的敏感性和95%的特异性,息肉3 10 mm的阳性预测值为92%,阴性预测值为95%。对于6mm至9mm的息肉,MDCT结肠造影显示敏感性为75%,特异性为100%,阳性预测值为100%,阴性预测值为90%。对于直径≥5 mm的息肉,MDCT结肠造影显示88%的敏感性和100%的特异性,阳性预测值为100%,阴性预测值为95%。结论:CT结肠造影是一种安全且微创的技术,是检查的有价值的诊断工具整个结肠,与其他大肠癌筛查测试相比,是一个很好的选择,因为它在1厘米以上的大肠病变中具有很高的敏感性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号