...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecology and Society: a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability >Identifying opportunities to improve governance of aquatic agricultural systems through participatory action research
【24h】

Identifying opportunities to improve governance of aquatic agricultural systems through participatory action research

机译:通过参与性行动研究确定改善水生农业系统治理的机会

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Challenges of governance often constitute critical obstacles to efforts to equitably improve livelihoods in social-ecological systems. Yet, just as often, these challenges go unspoken, or are viewed as fixed parts of the context, beyond the scope of influence of agricultural, development, or natural resource management initiatives. What does it take to get governance obstacles and opportunities out in the open, creating the space for constructive dialogue and collective action that can help to address them? We respond to this question by comparing experiences of participatory action research (PAR) in coastal and floodplain systems in four countries (Zambia, Solomon Islands, Bangladesh, and Cambodia) with a focus on understanding how to build more equitable governance arrangements. We found that governance improvement was often an implicit or secondary objective of initiatives that initially sought to address more technical natural resource or livelihood-related development challenges. We argue that using PAR principles of ownership, equity, shared analysis, and feedback built trust and helped to identify and act upon opportunities to address more difficult-to-shift dimensions of governance particularly in terms of stakeholder representation, distribution of authority, and accountability. Our findings suggest that the engaged and embedded approach of researcher-facilitators can help move from identifying opportunities for governance change to supporting stakeholders as they build more equitable governance arrangements.
机译:治理方面的挑战通常是阻碍努力公平改善社会生态系统生计的主要障碍。然而,与农业,发展或自然资源管理举措的影响力范围相比,这些挑战常常无言以对或被视为背景的固定部分。怎样才能公开消除治理障碍和机遇,为建设性对话和集体行动创造空间,以帮助解决这些障碍和机遇?我们通过比较四个国家(赞比亚,所罗门群岛,孟加拉国和柬埔寨)在沿海和洪泛区系统中的参与式行动研究(PAR)的经验来回答这个问题,重点是了解如何建立更公平的治理安排。我们发现,改善治理通常是最初旨在应对更多技术性自然资源或与民生相关的发展挑战的举措的隐含或次要目标。我们认为,使用所有权,股权,共享分析和反馈的PAR原则可以建立信任,并有助于识别并采取机会应对更难转变的治理维度,尤其是在利益相关方代表,权限分配和问责制方面。我们的研究结果表明,研究者促进者的参与和嵌入方法可以帮助从确定治理变革的机会转变为在构建更公平的治理安排时为利益相关者提供支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号