首页> 外文期刊>Educacion Medica >A program to help third year students to integrate content and form in the clinical history
【24h】

A program to help third year students to integrate content and form in the clinical history

机译:帮助三年级学生在临床病史中整合内容和形式的计划

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

> face="Verdana" size="2">Introduction. Communication skills are considered as important and independent capacity to be acquired by students, however, are a fundamental part of the consultation. Aim. To describe a formative program for third year students with the objective of integrating anamnesis and communication skills in an integrating way and evaluate the correlation between them both. Subjects and methods. Observational descriptive study. Location: Skills Classroom in the Medicine Faculty of Cordoba. Subjects: 158 3rd year medicine students. Interventions: an interactive program in communications skills in clinical stories performances has been developed. An independent evaluator valued the communication and anamnesis skills during the clinical interview of the recorded meetings with simulated patient using a tool ad hoc. Results. Average interview time: 5:56 min (95% CI = 5:38-6:15 min) (maximum 10 min). Average global score rating scale: 56.2 (maximum 104) (95% CI = 54.20-58.19); skills of doctor-patient average score: 25.58 (maximum 40) (95% CI = 24.7-26.5), and biomedical anamnesis: 30.61 (maximum 64) (95% CI = 29.20-32.03). A positive correlation exists between with the time used by students and the obtained punctuation in the rating scale (Pearson coefficient = 0.65; p 0.01), just like in the biomedical and communication sections (Pearson coefficient = 0.44; p 0.01). Conclusions. The program was feasible, in which the communications skills had the best performance: reactivity, non-verbal language, reception and closing interview; against a not well performed biomedical anamnesis. Time is an important variable to develop the skills learnt and the students uses less than the maximum. The group of students with the best psychosocial aspects, got more details of anamnesis in their interviews.
机译:> face =“ Verdana” size =“ 2”> 简介。沟通技巧被认为是重要的,学生获得独立的能力是咨询的基本组成部分。 目标。描述一个针对三年级学生的形成性计划,目的是以整合的方式整合记忆和沟通技巧,并评估他们之间的相关性。 主题和方法。观察性描述性研究。地点:科尔多瓦医学院的技能教室。受试者:158名三年级医学生。干预措施:已经开发了一个互动程序,用于交流临床故事表演中的技能。独立评估师在使用特设工具与模拟患者进行记录的会议的临床访谈期间,重视沟通和回忆的技能。 结果。平均采访时间:5:56分钟(95%CI = 5:38-6:15分钟)(最长10分钟)。全球平均总分评分量表:56.2(最高104)(95%CI = 54.20-58.19);医患平均得分:25.58(最高40)(95%CI = 24.7-26.5)和生物医学回忆:30.61(最高64)(95%CI = 29.20-32.03)。就像在生物医学和交流领域(皮尔森系数= 0.44)一样,与学生使用的时间和评分标准中的标点符号之间存在正相关(皮尔森系数= 0.65; p <0.01)。 ; p <0.01)。 结论。该程序是可行的,其沟通技巧表现最佳:反应性,非语言表达,接待和结束面试;反对表现不佳的生物医学回忆。时间是发展所学技能的重要变量,学生使用的时间少于最大的时间。心理社会方面最好的那群学生在访谈中得到了更多的回忆记忆细节。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号