...
首页> 外文期刊>Educacion Medica >Profile of learning preferences of students and professors of medicine: Element to consider in teaching
【24h】

Profile of learning preferences of students and professors of medicine: Element to consider in teaching

机译:医学生和教授的学习偏好概况:教学中要考虑的要素

获取原文

摘要

> face="Verdana" size="2">Introduction. It is important for students and teachers to identify their learning profiles. Subjects and methods. The consent of the author was solicited to translate and apply the VARK questionnaire to 530 students and 27 professors of Public Health course, which is given at first year medical students. Fisher's exact test was used to identify the existence of differences between the learning profiles of the professors and the learning modalities of the students and then both compared with the averages of grades separated by group. By means of inferential analysis the association between gender and group characteristics with the average grades looked for. Results. 31%, of the students displayed a single modality of learning, and 69% declared more than one learning modality; and of these last ones 14% said they development all four modalities. It is interesting to note that 41% are visual/kinesthetic and 64% of the students displayed of one to two modalities. About the teachers 26% used only one teaching modality, 74% used more than one, and 4% used all four modalities. There were no statistical significance differences between women and men neither between, morning and afternoon groups nor with high performance groups. Conclusions. This first approach allowed us to have a general vision of the preferences of learning in the studied population. When the teacher identifies how their students learn and also recognizes his/her own, he/she can enrich their educational practice, and approach it to the necessities of the students and, that way improve the teaching process and better the student's results.
机译:> face =“ Verdana” size =“ 2”> 简介。对学生和老师来说,确定他们的学习概况非常重要。 主题和方法。征集了作者的同意,将VARK调查表翻译和应用到530位学生和27位公共卫生课程的教授,这些课程是在医学一年级时提供的。费舍尔精确检验用于确定教授的学习方式和学生的学习方式之间是否存在差异,然后将两者与按组划分的平均成绩进行比较。通过推断分析,寻找性别和群体特征与平均成绩之间的关联。 结果。31%的学生表现出单一的学习方式,而69%的学生宣称有一种以上的学习方式。在这最后的14%中,他们说他们开发了所有四种方式。有趣的是,有41%的人是视觉/动觉的,有64%的学生以一种或两种方式表现出来。关于教师,26%仅使用一种教学方式,74%使用不止一种教学方式,4%使用所有四种教学方式。上午和下午组之间以及高性能组之间,男女之间没有统计学显着性差异。 结论。第一种方法使我们对研究人群的学习偏好有一个大致的了解。当老师确定学生的学习方式并认识到自己的学习方式时,他/她可以丰富他们的教育实践,并根据学生的需要进行学习,从而改善教学过程并提高学生的学习成绩。字体>

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号