首页> 外文期刊>Ecology and Evolution >Observer‐free experimental evaluation of habitat and distance effects on the detection of anuran and bird vocalizations
【24h】

Observer‐free experimental evaluation of habitat and distance effects on the detection of anuran and bird vocalizations

机译:无观察员的实验对栖息地和距离影响的无脊椎动物和鸟类发声检测的实验评估

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Acoustic surveys of vocalizing animals are conducted to determine density, distribution, and diversity. Acoustic surveys are traditionally performed by human listeners, but automated recording devices (ARD) are becoming increasingly popular. Signal strength decays, or attenuates, with increasing distance between source and receiver and some habitat types may differentially increase attenuation beyond the effects of distance alone. These combined effects are rarely accounted for in acoustic monitoring programs. We evaluated the performance of three playback devices and three ARD models using the calls of six anurans, six birds, and four pure tones. Based on these evaluations, we determined the optimal playback and recording devices. Using these optimal devices, we broadcast and recorded vocalizations in five habitat types along 1,000?m transects. We used generalized linear models to test for effects of habitat, distance, species, environmental, and landscape variables. We predicted detection probabilities for each vocalization, in each habitat type, from 0 to 1,000?m. Among playback devices, only a remote predator caller simulated vocalizations consistently. Differences of ~10?dB were observed among ARDs. For all species, we found differences in detectability between open and closed canopy habitats. We observed large differences in predicted detection probability among species in each habitat type, as well as along 1,000?m transects. Increases in temperature, barometric pressure, and wind speed significantly decreased detection probability. However, aside from differences among species, habitat, and distance, topography impeding a line‐of‐sight between sound source and receiver had the greatest negative influence on detections. Our results suggest researchers should model the effects of habitat, distance, and frequency on detection probability when performing acoustic surveys. To optimize survey design, we recommend pilot measurements among varying habitats.
机译:对发声动物进行声学调查以确定密度,分布和多样性。传统上,声学调查是由听众进行的,但是自动记录设备(ARD)变得越来越流行。信号强度随着源与接收器之间距离的增加而衰减,或者衰减,并且某些栖息地类型可能会单独地超过距离的影响而有区别地增加衰减。这些组合的影响很少在声学监测程序中考虑到。我们使用六只无尾猴,六只鸟和四只纯音调来评估三个播放设备和三个ARD模型的性能。基于这些评估,我们确定了最佳的播放和录制设备。使用这些最佳设备,我们在1,000?m的样带中广播和记录了五种栖息地类型的发声。我们使用广义线性模型来测试栖息地,距离,物种,环境和景观变量的影响。我们预测了每种生境在每种栖息地类型中从0到1,000?m的检测概率。在播放设备中,只有远程捕食者呼叫者始终模拟发声。在ARD之间观察到〜10?dB的差异。对于所有物种,我们发现开放和封闭的树冠栖息地之间的可检测性有所不同。我们观察到每种生境类型以及沿1000μm样带的物种之间的预测检测概率有很大差异。温度,大气压力和风速的升高大大降低了检测概率。但是,除了物种,栖息地和距离之间的差异外,地形阻碍了声源和接收器之间的视线对探测的负面影响最大。我们的结果表明,研究人员在进行声学勘测时应模拟栖息地,距离和频率对检测概率的影响。为了优化调查设计,我们建议在不同的栖息地之间进行试点测量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号