首页> 外文期刊>Iranian journal of public health. >Parallel Quality Assessment of Emergency Departments by European Foundation for Quality Management Model and Iranian National Program for Hospital Evaluation
【24h】

Parallel Quality Assessment of Emergency Departments by European Foundation for Quality Management Model and Iranian National Program for Hospital Evaluation

机译:欧洲质量管理模式基金会和伊朗国家医院评估计划对急诊科进行并行质量评估

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundEuropean Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) model is a widely used quality management system (QMS) worldwide, including Iran. Current study aims to verify the quality assessment results of Iranian National Program for Hospital Evaluation (INPHE) based on those of EFQM.Methods:This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2012 on a sample of emergency departments (EDs) affiliated with Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Iran. The standard questionnaire of EFQM (V-2010) was used to gather appropriate data. The results were compared with those of INPHE. MS Excel was used to classify and display the findings.Results:The average assessment score of the EDs based on the INPHE and EFQM model were largely different (i.e. 86.4% and 31%, respectively). In addition, the variation range among five EDs’ scores according to each model was also considerable (22% for EFQM against 7% of INPHE), especially in the EDs with and without prior record of applying QMSs.Conclusion:The INPHE’s assessment results were not confirmed by EFQM model. Moreover, the higher variation range among EDs’ scores using EFQM model could allude to its more differentiation power in assessing the performance comparing with INPHE. Therefore, a need for improvement in the latter drawing on other QMSs’ (such as EFQM) strengths, given the results emanated from its comparison with EFQM seems indispensable.
机译:背景技术欧洲质量管理基金会(EFQM)模型是包括伊朗在内的全球范围内广泛使用的质量管理系统(QMS)。本研究旨在验证基于EFQM的伊朗国家医院评估计划(INPHE)的质量评估结果。方法:本横断面研究于2012年对伊朗德黑兰大学附属急诊室(ED)样本进行。伊朗医学科学(TUMS)。 EFQM(V-2010)的标准调查表用于收集适当的数据。将结果与INPHE的结果进行比较。结果:基于INPHE和EFQM模型的ED的平均评估得分相差很大(分别为86.4%和31%)。此外,根据每个模型的五个ED得分之间的差异范围也相当大(EFQM为22%,INPHE为7%),特别是在有和没有事先应用QMS的ED中。结论:INPHE的评估结果是EFQM模型未确认。此外,使用EFQM模型的ED得分之间较高的变异范围,可以暗示其与INPHE相比,在评估绩效方面具有更大的区分能力。因此,鉴于将其与EFQM进行比较所得出的结果,似乎有必要利用其他QMS(例如EFQM)的优势进行改进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号