首页> 外文期刊>International Soil and Water Conservation Research >Assessing the costs and benefits of improved land management practices in three watershed areas in Ethiopia
【24h】

Assessing the costs and benefits of improved land management practices in three watershed areas in Ethiopia

机译:评估埃塞俄比亚三个流域地区改善土地管理做法的成本和收益

获取原文

摘要

Highlights ? We examine the on-site costs and benefits of three major soil conservation measures. ? A production function is estimated as the basis for the cost–benefit analysis. ? We show that soil conservation measures significantly increase productivity. ? A longer term perspective is needed for these private welfare gains to materialize. Abstract Unsustainable land use management and the resulting soil erosion are among the most pervasive problems in rural Ethiopia, where most of the country’s people live, jeopardizing food security. Despite various efforts to introduce soil conservation measures and assess their costs and benefits, it is unclear how efficient these measures are from an economic point of view in securing food production. This paper examines the costs and benefits of three soil conservation measures applied in the country in three different rural districts facing different degrees of soil erosion problems using survey data collected from 750 farm households. A production function is estimated to quantify the costs and benefits of more sustainable land use management practices. We show that the soil conservation measures significantly increase productivity and hence food security. Comparing the costs and benefits, the results indicate that implementing soil conservation measures would benefit farm communities in the case study areas through increased grain productivity and food security. Keywords Soil conservation ; Cost–benefit analysis ; Cobb–Douglas production function ; Blue Nile ; Ethiopia prs.rt("abs_end"); 1. Introduction Soil erosion and the resulting agricultural land degradation are the most severe environmental problem in the Ethiopian highlands ( Shiferaw & Holden (1999) , Pender, Gebremehedhin, Benin, & Ehui (2001) , Amsalu & de Graaff (2007) and Tefera & Sterk (2010) Pender, Gebremehedhin, Benin, & Ehui, 2001 ; Shiferaw & Holden, 1999 ; Tefera & Sterk, 2010 ), jeopardizing the sustainability of agricultural production and ultimately national food security ( Sonneveld & Keyzer (2002) and Kassie et al. (2008) ). The on-site effects are a major source of concern since they threaten the livelihoods of a majority of the country's population. The highlands of Ethiopia cover 40 percent of the country’s land mass and are home to almost 88 percent of its human population and 70 percent of the total livestock population ( Ayele, 1999 ). The causes underlying land degradation are a combination of climate conditions and extreme weather events, such as heavy rainfall and droughts, population pressure, unsustainable agricultural land use practices such as overgrazing, cultivation of steep slopes, and no or limited fallow periods ( Geist & Lambin, 2004 ), and lack of institutions to enact regulations or laws that enhance sustainable land management practices ( FAO, 2011 ). The problem is transboundary in nature particularly in the upper Blue Nile basin where soil and excessive runoff that leave the boundary of individual farms cause off-site or off-farm impacts to reservoirs, irrigation schemes and waterways downstream across political borders. An example is the sedimentation of the Gezira irrigation scheme in Sudan due to massive erosion from the Upper Blue Nile river basin. Ahmed (2003) reported that the sediment load of the Blue Nile at the border at El Diem (120?km upstream of the El-Roseires Dam) is 140 million tons per year, causing management difficulties of irrigation canal networks in the Gezira scheme and consuming more than 60 percent of the total costs of the operation and maintenance in sediment clearance. In the Ethiopian highlands, topsoil loss due to soil erosion is estimated to be 1.5 billion tons per year ( Taddese, 2001 ), and average annual soil loss from cultivated land is 42?t/ha ( Hurni, 1993 ). This is very high compared to other countries worldwide ( Pimentel, 2006 ). Total estimated soil erosion in the US, for example, a country 9 times the size of Ethiopia is 3 billion t/year (Carnell, 2001 cited in Pimentel, 2006 ). The estimated soil formation rate in Ethiopia is less than 2?t/ha/year, which is very low compared to the estimated soil erosion rates ( Hurni, 1983 ). Worldwide soil erosion rates are highest in Asia, Africa and South America, averaging 30–40?t/ha/year, and lowest in the United States and Europe, averaging about 17?t/ha/year ( Barrow, 1991 ). Studies conducted in the Amhara region confirm that soil loss due to erosion has a significant impact on the decline of crop yield and loss of agricultural land (e.g. Ludi, 2002; Shiferaw & Holden, 1999 ; Sonneveld, 2002 ). In order to mitigate the problem of soil erosion, the regional government and non-governmental organizations have supported various efforts to introduce soil conservation measures.
机译:强调 ?我们研究了三种主要水土保持措施的现场成本和收益。 ?估计生产函数作为成本效益分析的基础。 ?我们表明水土保持措施显着提高了生产力。 ?这些私人福利收益的实现需要更长远的眼光。摘要不可持续的土地利用管理及其造成的水土流失是埃塞俄比亚农村地区最普遍的问题,埃塞俄比亚农村是该国大多数人居住的地方,这危及粮食安全。尽管采取了各种措施来采取土壤保护措施并评估其成本和收益,但从经济角度看,这些措施在确保粮食生产方面的效率如何尚不清楚。本文使用从750个农户收集的调查数据,考察了在三个面临不同程度水土流失问题的农村地区,在该国采用的三种水土保持措施的成本和收益。估计生产函数可以量化更可持续的土地使用管理实践的成本和收益。我们表明,水土保持措施显着提高了生产力,从而提高了粮食安全。比较成本和收益,结果表明,实施土壤保护措施将通过提高谷物生产力和粮食安全来使案例研究区的农场社区受益。关键词水土保持;成本效益分析 ; Cobb–Douglas生产函数;青尼罗河;埃塞俄比亚prs.rt(“ abs_end”); 1.引言在埃塞俄比亚高地,水土流失和由此造成的农业土地退化是最严重的环境问题(Shiferaw和Holden(1999),Pender,Gebremehedhin,Benin和Ehui(2001),Amsalu和de Graaff(2007)和Tefera &Sterk(2010)Pender,Gebremehedhin,Benin,&Ehui,2001; Shiferaw&Holden,1999; Tefera&Sterk,2010),危及农业生产的可持续性并最终损害国家粮食安全(Sonneveld&Keyzer(2002)和Kassie等) (2008))。现场影响是一个令人关注的主要问题,因为它们威胁到该国大多数人口的生计。埃塞俄比亚的高地覆盖了该国40%的土地,是其88%的人口和70%的总牲畜种群的家园(Ayele,1999年)。造成土地退化的原因是气候条件和极端天气事件的结合,例如强降雨和干旱,人口压力,不可持续的农业土地利用做法(例如过度放牧,陡坡耕种以及无休耕期或有限休耕期)(Geist和Lambin (2004年),缺乏制定可加强可持续土地管理实践的法规或法律的机构(粮农组织,2011年)。问题本质上是跨界的,特别是在青尼罗河上游流域,那里的土壤和过多的径流离开了单个农场的边界,对跨政治边界的下游水库,灌溉计划和水道造成了场外或农场外的影响。一个例子是由于上蓝尼罗河上游流域的大规模侵蚀而造成的苏丹Gezira灌溉计划的沉积。 Ahmed(2003)报告说,在El Diem(El-Roseires大坝上游120?km)边界处的Blue Nile的沉积物负荷为每年1.4亿吨,这在Gezira计划和在清除泥沙方​​面,花费了运维总成本的60%以上。在埃塞俄比亚高地,每年因土壤侵蚀造成的表土流失估计为15亿吨(Taddese,2001年),耕地的年均土壤流失量为42吨/公顷(Hurni,1993年)。与全球其他国家相比,这一数字很高(Pimentel,2006年)。例如,美国的估计土壤侵蚀总量为埃塞俄比亚的9倍,为30亿吨/年(Carnell,2001; Pimentel,2006)。埃塞俄比亚估计的土壤形成速率小于2吨/公顷/年,与估计的土壤侵蚀速率相比非常低(Hurni,1983)。全球土壤侵蚀率在亚洲,非洲和南美最高,平均为30–40?t / ha /年,而在美国和欧洲最低,平均约为17?t / ha /年(Barrow,1991)。在阿姆哈拉(Amhara)地区进行的研究证实,由于侵蚀造成的土壤流失对农作物减产和耕地流失具有重大影响(例如Ludi,2002; Shiferaw&Holden,1999; Sonneveld,2002)。为了减轻水土流失的问题,区域政府和非政府组织支持采取各种措施来采取水土保持措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号