首页> 外文期刊>Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery >Use Of Low-Level Laser Therapy In Conservative Treatment Of Delayed Union Of Human Upper And Lower Limb Fractures
【24h】

Use Of Low-Level Laser Therapy In Conservative Treatment Of Delayed Union Of Human Upper And Lower Limb Fractures

机译:低水平激光疗法在保守治疗上肢和下肢骨折​​延迟愈合中的应用

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective: The current clinical case series assesses the early clinical outcome of the use of low-level laser in the treatment of delayed union of upper and lower extremity fractures.Materials and Methods: The patient cohort consisted of 17 consecutive unselected patients with delayed union. All patients refused operations. All subjects were given functional Sarmiento brace, together with low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on alternate days for 8weeks in upper limb fracture cases, and 12 weeks in lower limb fracture cases.Results: All patients had solid union, mean time for union for upper and lower limb fractures were 7 and 10 weeks respectively. The two non-responders include one patient who refused to come for follow up treatment and another who was non-compliant with splint wear The calculated p value was statistically significant at p < 0.05.Conclusion: LLLT markedly shortens the healing time and can be used in treating upper and lower limbs fractures with delayed union. Introduction Delayed union, by definition, in general occurs when there are no signs of bony healing or a delay in bony union of the fracture ends after an adequate period of time had elapsed. In other words, a solid union is not detected within an expected time frame. The exact timing varies according to age, the bony part involved, and extent of soft tissue injury. Traditionally, many clinicians would consider operative intervention in the face of a delayed union. However, not every patient consents for an operative intervention. In such scenarios, we as clinicians still need to seek ways to enhance bony healing using non-invasive methodologies as this group of patients dislikes the idea of invasive intervention or operative intervention.The use of low-level laser therapy in promoting fracture healing of human fractures had previously been reported by the author [1] and also from clinicians in Taiwan [2]. This study represents the first ever study to assess the clinical use of LLLT in the conservative treatment of delayed fracture union of human upper and lower extremity fractures.Advantages of the use of LLLT in delayed fracture union is manifold. Firstly, the procedure is non-invasive and spares the patient an operative intervention. Operative intervention in general not only involves higher cost, but also it leaves the patient with a surgical scar and complications sometimes occur after an operation for delayed union such as infection or failure of metallic implants. In addition, a second operation is often required for removal of the metallic implant in younger subjects. The mean age of the patient population is relatively young in the current study. If a subsequent study reveals the same clinical efficacy in the elderly, this would be an extra advantage since older patients have in general a higher operative risk. Secondly, the world literature on LLLT showed it is free of side effects and has been in use in Europe over 30 years. Thirdly, LLLT administration does not involve higher costs with the average cost of administration per session being same as conventional physical therapy in the author’s institute. It should be noted that conventional physical therapy machines do not have bio-modulation effects as does LLLT [3] and thus cannot in effect promote the process of fracture healing. Materials and methods The study population consisted of a series of consecutive unselected 17 patients with a mean age of 26 (range 9 to 39) presenting with clinical delayed union of an upper or lower limb fracture. All of the patients had had not less than 6 weeks of casting done in other medical units but there was inadequate bony healing response on serial radiological assessments. All patients who entered the study refused operative intervention which represented the main pre-requisite for study entry and all consented for the use of LLLT as well as Sarmiento functional bracing as the sole treatment modality. Other exclusion criteria included history of psychiatric
机译:目的:当前的临床病例系列评估了使用低水平激光治疗上,下肢骨折延迟愈合的早期临床结果。材料与方法:该患者队列由17例连续的非选择性延迟愈合患者组成。所有患者均拒绝手术。所有受试者均在上肢骨折病例中每隔8天,在下肢骨折病例中连续12天,每隔几天进行功能性Sarmiento支架和低水平激光治疗(LLLT)。上肢和下肢骨折​​分别为7周和10周。两名无反应者包括一名拒绝随访的患者和另一名不符合夹板磨损的患者。计算出的p值在p <0.05上具有统计学意义。结论:LLLT显着缩短了治愈时间,可以使用延迟愈合治疗上肢和下肢骨折引言根据定义,通常在没有骨愈合的迹象或经过足够长的时间后骨折末端的骨愈合延迟的情况下发生延迟愈合。换句话说,在预期的时间范围内未检测到牢固的联合。确切的时间根据年龄,所涉及的骨部分以及软组织损伤的程度而有所不同。传统上,许多临床医生会考虑在延迟工会的情况下进行手术干预。但是,并非每个患者都同意进行手术干预。在这种情况下,作为临床医生,我们仍然需要寻求使用非侵入性方法来增强骨愈合的方法,因为这组患者不喜欢侵入性干预或手术性干预的想法。低水平激光疗法在促进人类骨折愈合中的应用作者先前曾报道过骨折[1],台湾临床医生也曾报道[2]。这项研究代表了有史以来第一个评估LLLT在保守治疗上,下肢延迟骨折愈合中的临床应用的研究。LLLT在延迟骨折愈合中使用的优势是多方面的。首先,该过程是非侵入性的,并且使患者免于手术干预。通常,手术干预不仅成本较高,而且还会给患者带来手术疤痕,有时会因手术延迟而导致并发症,例如感染或金属植入物失效。另外,在较年轻的受试者中通常需要第二次手术以去除金属植入物。在当前研究中,患者人群的平均年龄相对较小。如果随后的研究显示对老年人的临床疗效相同,这将是一个额外的优势,因为老年患者通常具有更高的手术风险。其次,有关LLLT的世界文献表明,它没有副作用,并且在欧洲已经使用了30多年。第三,LLLT的管理不会带来更高的费用,每次会议的平均管理费用与作者所在研究所的常规物理疗法相同。应该注意的是,传统的物理治疗机不像LLLT [3]那样具有生物调节作用,因此不能有效地促进骨折愈合的过程。材料和方法研究人群包括一系列连续的未选择的17例患者,平均年龄26岁(9岁至39岁),并表现为上肢或下肢骨折的临床延迟愈合。所有患者在其他医疗部门进行的铸造手术不少于6周,但在系列放射学评估中骨愈合反应不足。所有进入研究的患者均拒绝接受手术干预,这代表了进入研究的主要前提,并且所有人均同意使用LLLT以及Sarmiento功能支架作为唯一治疗方式。其他排除标准包括精神病史

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号