首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of standard wound management versus negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of adult patients with an open fracture of the lower limb: UK Wound management of Open Lower Limb Fractures (UK WOLFF)
【24h】

Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of standard wound management versus negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of adult patients with an open fracture of the lower limb: UK Wound management of Open Lower Limb Fractures (UK WOLFF)

机译:标准伤口处理与负压伤口治疗在成年下肢开放性骨折患者中的随机对照试验方案:英国开放式下肢骨折的英国伤口管理(UK WOLFF)

获取原文
       

摘要

Introduction Patients who sustain open lower limb fractures have reported infection risks as high as 27%. The type of dressing applied after initial debridement could potentially affect this risk. In this trial, standard dressings will be compared with a new emerging treatment, negative pressure wound therapy, for patients with open lower limb fractures. Methods and analysis All adult patients presenting with an open lower limb fracture, with a Gustilo and Anderson (G&A) grade 2/3, will be considered for inclusion. 460 consented patients will provide 90% power to detect a difference of eight points in the Disability Rating Index (DRI) score at 12?months, at the 5% level. A randomisation sequence, stratified by trial centre and G&A grade, will be produced and administered by a secure web-based service. A qualitative substudy will assess patients’ experience of giving consent for the trial, and acceptability of trial procedures to patients and staff. Patients will have clinical follow-up in a fracture clinic up to a minimum of 12?months as per standard National Health Service (NHS) practice. Functional and quality of life outcome data will be collected using the DRI, SF12 and EQ-5D questionnaires at 3, 6, 9 and 12?months postoperatively. In addition, information will be requested with regards to resource use and any late complications or surgical interventions related to their injury. The main analysis will investigate differences in the DRI score at 1?year after injury, between the two treatment groups on an intention-to-treat basis. Tests will be two sided and considered to provide evidence for a significant difference if p values are less than 0.05. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval was given by NRES Committee West Midlands—Coventry & Warwickshire on 6/2/2012 (ref: 12/WM/0001). The results of the trial will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and presentations at relevant conferences. Trial registration number ISRCTN33756652.
机译:简介患有开放性下肢骨折的患者报告感染风险高达27%。初始清创后使用的敷料类型可能会影响这种风险。在该试验中,将标准敷料与新兴的下肢开放性骨折患者的负压伤口疗法进行比较。方法和分析所有表现为下肢开放性骨折,古斯蒂洛和安德森(G&A)等级为2/3的成年患者将被考虑纳入研究。 460名同意的患者将提供90%的能力,以5%的水平在12个月时检测出残疾评分指数(DRI)得分相差8分。由试验中心和G&A等级分层的随机序列将由安全的基于Web的服务生成和管理。定性子研究将评估患者对试验表示同意的经验,以及对患者和医护人员的试验程序的可接受性。根据标准的国家卫生服务(NHS)惯例,患者将在骨折诊所接受临床随访,至少12个月。术后3、6、9和12个月使用DRI,SF12和EQ-5D问卷收集功能和生活质量结果数据。此外,将要求提供有关资源使用以及与之相关的任何后期并发症或外科手术干预的信息。主要分析将在意向性治疗的基础上,调查两个治疗组在受伤后1年时DRI评分的差异。如果p值小于0.05,则测试将是双向的,并被认为提供了显着差异的证据。道德与传播NRES西米德兰兹郡考文垂和沃里克郡NRES委员会于2012年6月2日获得了道德批准(参考号:12 / WM / 0001)。该试验的结果将在相关会议上通过同行评审的出版物和演示文稿进行传播。试用注册号ISRCTN33756652。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号