...
首页> 外文期刊>Intestinal research. >Efficacy of Hood-cap Assisted Colonoscopy; Comparison with Conventional Colonoscopy
【24h】

Efficacy of Hood-cap Assisted Colonoscopy; Comparison with Conventional Colonoscopy

机译:头罩辅助结肠镜检查的功效;与常规结肠镜检查的比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background/Aims A few studies showed that hood-cap assisted colonoscopy (CAC) had improved cecal intubation rate and cecal intubation time but did not help in finding colon polyps in comparison with conventional colonoscopy (CC). However, other studies have shown different results. Therefore, we investigated the efficacy of CAC for the cecal intubation time and polyp detection rate. Methods Patients for colonoscopy in Busan St. Mary's Medical Center were enrolled to this randomized controlled trial between July 2010 and September 2010. The evaluated outcomes were polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and cecal intubation time in all patients, in difficult cases (history of previous abdominal or pelvic surgery, obesity, old age), and in the expert and non-expert groups. Results A total of 260 patients enrolled in this study were randomly allocated to the CAC group (n=130), or CC group (n=130). The overall cecal intubation time was shorter in the CAC group (5.7±3.4 min vs . 7.8±5.7 min, P Conclusions The use of CAC improved the detection rate of colon polyps and shortened the cecal intubation time for both the expert and non-expert groups.
机译:背景/目的一些研究表明,与传统的结肠镜检查(CC)相比,头罩辅助结肠镜检查(CAC)可以改善盲肠插管率和盲肠插管时间,但无助于发现结肠息肉。但是,其他研究显示了不同的结果。因此,我们研究了CAC对盲肠插管时间和息肉检出率的疗效。方法于2010年7月至2010年9月在釜山圣玛丽医疗中心接受结肠镜检查的患者参加了该随机对照试验。评估的结果为所有病例中息肉的检出率,腺瘤的检出率和盲肠插管时间(在困难病例中(历史)) (以前的腹部或骨盆手术,肥胖,老年),以及专家组和非专家组。结果本研究共纳入260名患者,随机分为CAC组(n = 130)或CC组(n = 130)。 CAC组的总盲肠插管时间较短(5.7±3.4 min vs. 7.8±5.7 min,P)结论使用CAC可以提高结肠息肉的检出率,并缩短了专家和非专家的盲肠插管时间组。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号