首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Medicine >Balloon-Assisted Colonoscopy after Incomplete Conventional Colonoscopy—Experience from Two European Centres with A Comprehensive Review of the Literature
【2h】

Balloon-Assisted Colonoscopy after Incomplete Conventional Colonoscopy—Experience from Two European Centres with A Comprehensive Review of the Literature

机译:气球辅助结肠镜检查在不完全常规的结肠镜检查后 - 来自两个欧洲中心的经验全面审查了文献

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Conventional colonoscopy (CC) allows access for colonic investigation and intervention; in the small group in whom CC is unsuccessful alternative imaging is often sufficient. There remains a subset, however, requiring full colonic visualisation or intervention. Balloon-assisted colonoscopy (BAC) gives a further option when access is difficult. Aims: This study aims to present the experience with BAC of two European tertiary referral centres. Methods: Procedures were carried out under local protocol over 15-years (2006–2020). Markers of procedural quality such as caecal intubation, complications and comfort were retrospectively compiled and analysed. Published evidence was summarised for comparison. Results: 122 procedures were undertaken, with polyps the most frequent indication and 90.2% having at least one previously incomplete CC. Features associated with difficult colonoscopy were common, including intraabdominal surgery (32.0%). 92.6% reached the caecum; completion was higher (96.3%) in those failing CC due to discomfort and lower in those failing due to anatomical difficulties (90.7%) or previous surgery (84.6%). Mean time to the caecum was 20.9 minutes and mean midazolam and fentanyl doses were 2.6 mg and 49.9 µg with low discomfort scores. Conclusion(s): Balloon-assisted colonoscopy is successful in >90% of patients, is well-tolerated, and is safe.
机译:背景:常规结肠镜检查(CC)允许访问结肠调查和干预;在CC是不成功的替代成像的小组中通常是足够的。然而,仍然存在一个亚空间,需要完全结肠可视化或干预。气囊辅助结肠镜检查(BAC)在困难时提供进一步的选择。目的:本研究旨在展示两个欧洲三级推荐中心的BAC的经验。方法:在15年(2006-2020)下的当地议定书下进行程序。追溯编制和分析了遗传性插管,并发症和舒适等程序质量的标记。公布的证据总结了比较。结果:122种方法进行了息肉,息肉最常见的指示和90.2%,具有至少一个先前不完全的CC。与困难的结肠镜检查相关的特征是常见的,包括肿瘤腹部手术(32.0%)。 92.6%达到了盲肠;由于在解剖困难(90.7%)或以前的手术(84.6%),在那些由于不适而导致的疾病疾病而失败并且降低了患有CC的患者的完成更高(96.3%)。平均遗传时间为20.9分钟,平均咪达唑仑和芬太尼剂量为2.6mg和49.9μg,具有低不适的评分。结论:气球辅助结肠镜检查成功> 90%的患者,耐受良好,是安全的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号