...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of TROPICAL DISEASE & Health >The Scorpion Sting: Epidemiology, Clinical Symptoms, Treatment, Surveillance and Reporting Obstacles in the Salfit District (West Bank) (2014-2015)
【24h】

The Scorpion Sting: Epidemiology, Clinical Symptoms, Treatment, Surveillance and Reporting Obstacles in the Salfit District (West Bank) (2014-2015)

机译:蝎子刺:萨尔菲特地区(西岸)的流行病学,临床症状,治疗,监视和报告障碍(2014年至2015年)

获取原文
           

摘要

Aim: This study was conducted in order to highlight the epidemical status of scorpion stings for the period 2014- 2015 in the Salfit district, and the obstacles facing the Ministry of Health in surveillance and reporting of scorpion sting, also to provide information to decision-makers to take the appropriate decisions in order to strengthen and activate the epidemiological surveillance system which is the most important to control the disease especially in tropical disease. Study Design and Methods: A retrospective and cross sectional study were done to discuss the epidemiological scorpion sting of Sixty stung patient reports (32 males and 28 females) during the years 2014-2015, also Specific questionnaire was prepared to estimate the Number of scorpion sting cases treated in private sectors, and to highlighted the main causes which prevent this sectors from reported the cases to Salfit Primary Health Care center (SPHCC). And all data was analyzed using SPSS software Version 17. Results: The results were that scorpion sting affected both sexes with more prevalence among males (53.3%) and in all age groups, The scorpion sting site were more prevalent in limbs (63.4%), The most prevalent of the patients was from Salfit City (25%). The results show that the most scorpion stings occurred in the summer and autumn seasons (50%, 40%) respectively and most of them occurred by a scorpion of an unknown color (61.7%), Most of clinical manifestations were localized symptoms with (Class I) (63.3%). The unity- histamine (Promethazine) and corticosteroid (Dexamethasone) was drug treatments that were the most used for all cases. The results also show that the number of cases treated in public health sectors were 60 cases during the years 2014-2015, average (30 cases yearly), and the estimated number of cases treated in private health sectors were 643 cases during the years 2014-2015 with average (321.5 cases yearly), and (75%, 80%) of the private clinical centers included in the study received cases of scorpion stings during the years 2014-2015 respectively; (85%,95%) of these cases were not reported to the SPHCC during the years 2014-2015 respectively. The results show the private doctors and private clinical centers didn’t reported the cases to SPHCC because of they not considered an important event and due to the weakness of the relationship between the public and private sectors. The results show that the epidemiological profile of scorpion sting cases is not yet clarified in (SPHC) and in the Public Hospital. And absence of a connecting system is between SPHCC and the Public Hospital, which led to lost data and under reporting. Limitations of Study: This study for the specific geographical area (Salfit district) to evaluate the epidemiology of 60 scorpion sting patients in the Salfit district recorded at SPHC and the Salfit public hospital for the period from 2014 to 2015. Absence of specific reports of scorpion stings lead to lack in information available. The data found to be lacking were the site of sting, the place of sting, scorpion body color or species, time from sting until assistance (TSA)(hours), and clinical manifestations. Conclusion: More studies are needed to understanding the epidemiological status of scorpion sting and to have full information about the causes of unreported cases in public health sectors but according to this study the results show that there were gaps in the information available about scorpion stings in SPHC and in the public hospital. The results show that lack of collaboration between the private health and public health sectors and more collaboration is needed between inter-sectoral and Public Health Services.
机译:目的:进行这项研究是为了突出2014-2015年萨尔菲特地区蝎fit的流行状况,以及卫生部在监测和报告蝎st方面面临的障碍,还为决策提供信息。制定者做出适当的决定,以加强和激活流行病学监测系统,这对于控制该疾病(尤其是热带疾病)最为重要。研究设计和方法:进行回顾性和横断面研究,以探讨2014-2015年间60例st病报告(男性32例,女性28例)的流行病学蝎,并准备了专门的问卷调查以估计蝎estimate的数量并在私营部门中处理这些病例,并着重指出阻止该部门向Salfit初级保健中心(SPHCC)报告病例的主要原因。并使用SPSS软件版本17分析了所有数据。结果:结果表明,蝎st对男性和女性的患病率均较高(53.3%),在所有年龄组中,蝎ing的患病率在四肢中更为普遍(63.4%) ,最普遍的患者是Salfit City(25%)。结果表明,蝎子ing伤最多发生在夏季和秋季(50%,40%),大多数是由颜色不明的蝎子发生(61.7%),大多数临床表现是局部症状为(Class I)(63.3%)。组胺(异丙嗪)和糖皮质激素(地塞米松)是所有病例中使用最广泛的药物治疗。结果还显示,2014-2015年期间,公共卫生部门治疗的病例数为60例,平均(每年30例),而2014-2015年期间,私人卫生部门估计的治疗例数为643例。 2015年,该研究中包括的私人临床中心平均每年(321.5例)和(75%,80%)分别在2014-2015年期间接受蝎子cases伤病例;这些案件中(85%,95%)分别在2014-2015年期间未报告给SPHCC。结果显示,私人医生和私人临床中心未将病例报告给SPHCC,因为它们不被认为是重要事件,并且由于公共部门和私人部门之间的关系薄弱。结果显示,在(SPHC)和公立医院中,蝎毒ing病例的流行病学特征尚不清楚。 SPHCC和公立医院之间没有连接系统,这导致数据丢失和报告不足。研究的局限性:本研究针对特定地理区域(Salfit区),以评估2014年至2015年期间在SPHC和Salfit公立医院记录的Salfit区中60名蝎ing患者的流行病学。缺少蝎子的具体报告刺痛导致缺乏可用信息。发现的数据不足,包括刺痛的部位,刺痛的位置,蝎子的体色或种类,从刺痛到辅助的时间(小时)以及临床表现。结论:需要更多的研究来了解蝎的流行病学状况,并全面了解公共卫生部门未报告病例的原因,但根据这项研究,结果表明,在SPHC中有关蝎ing的可用信息存在差距在公立医院结果表明,私营卫生部门与公共卫生部门之间缺乏协作,部门间卫生与公共卫生部门之间需要更多的协作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号