...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Shoulder Surgery >Intra-articular infiltration therapy for patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis: A systematic review of the literature
【24h】

Intra-articular infiltration therapy for patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis: A systematic review of the literature

机译:盂肱骨关节炎患者的关节内浸润治疗:系统的文献复习

获取原文

摘要

Background:Conservative treatments are especially in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GH-OA) important, since shoulder arthroplasty has its limitations. In this systematic review, we will evaluate the current evidence regarding the efficacy of intra-articular (IA) infiltration treatment options in patients with GH-OA.Materials and Methods:The following databases are searched: Pubmed/Medline, Cochrane Clinical Trial Register, Embase and the WHO clinical trial register. All IA injection products used for the treatment of shoulder OA in humans are included.Results:A total of 8 studies could be included in this review. Hyaluronic acid (HA) showed effect sizes of 2.07, 2.02 and 2.11 at 6, 12 and 26 weeks follow-up, respectively. Placebo (1.60, 1.82 and 1.68) also showed stable effect sizes at the same time points. The efficacy of corticosteroids (CS) decreased rapidly at follow-up (1.08, 0.43 and 0.19). Although statistical significant, the maximum difference in effect sizes between HA and placebo was only 0.43 with absolute values between 2.0 and 6.4 on a 100-point visual analogue score for pain.Conclusion:IA treatment with HA has a good efficacy at follow-up compared to baseline. However, the difference in efficacy between HA and placebo never reaches the minimal clinically important difference at any of the follow-up points. We are not able to give clear recommendations for the use of IA CS injections in patients with GH-OA. In future research, we recommend focusing on sufficiently powered randomized trials to compare the efficacies of HA, CS, placebo and other IA treatment options in patients with GH-OA.
机译:背景:由于肩关节置换术有其局限性,因此保守治疗在肱肱骨骨关节炎(GH-OA)患者中尤为重要。在本系统评价中,我们将评估有关GH-OA患者关节内(IA)渗透治疗选择的有效性的现有证据。 Embase和WHO临床试验注册簿。包括所有用于治疗人类肩膀OA的IA注射产品。结果:该评价总共可包括8项研究。透明质酸(HA)在第6、12和26周的随访中显示分别为2.07、2.02和2.11。安慰剂(1.60、1.82和1.68)在相同时间点也显示稳定的效应大小。皮质类固醇(CS)的疗效在随访中迅速下降(1.08、0.43和0.19)。尽管具有统计学意义,但在100点视觉模拟疼痛评分上,HA和安慰剂之间的最大效应差异仅为0.43,绝对值在2.0至6.4之间。结论:与HA相比,IA治疗具有良好的疗效基线。但是,HA和安慰剂之间的疗效差异在任何随访点均从未达到最小的临床重要差异。我们无法为GH-OA患者使用IA CS注射剂提供明确的建议。在未来的研究中,我们建议关注于功能强大的随机试验,以比较HA,CS,安慰剂和其他IA治疗方案对GH-OA患者的疗效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号