首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Prevention and Treatment >Effectiveness of Mckenzie Exercises and Mat Based Pilates Exercises in Subjects with Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Comparative Study
【24h】

Effectiveness of Mckenzie Exercises and Mat Based Pilates Exercises in Subjects with Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Comparative Study

机译:Mckenzie锻炼和基于垫的普拉提锻炼对慢性非特异性下腰痛患者的疗效:一项比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Study design: A single blinded, randomized control trial, pretest-posttest design, with 6 week treatment programme. Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of Mckenzie exercises to that of a mat based Pilates exercise in improving the pain, functional disability and trunk ROM associated with CNLBP (Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain).Background: Therapeutic approaches developed by Mckenzie and Pilates are becoming popular; however, there have been no reports on their difference effectiveness. Methods and measure: Thirty physically active subjects between 20 and 65 years old with CNLBP were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups. McKenzie exercise group (MEG) received McKenzie exercises for 6 weeks based on the assessment; while the Mat based pilates exercise (MBPE) group received Pilates exercise for the same 6 weeks duration. The outcome measures of pain are measured by the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), functional disability is measured using a Rolland Morris disability questionnaire (RMDQ) and the trunk ROM is measured using modified Schobers method. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze the data. The results: No statistical difference existed on posttest comparisons were made on outcome data between groups on pain (p<0.23), disability (p<0.62), trunk flexion (p<0.75) and trunk extension (p<0.27), While both the groups show improvements for all the measures that were assessed individually and they were significant (p<0.01). Conclusion: The results may help physiotherapists in clinical decision-making. Between group comparisons of changes in the dependent variable scores revealed no statistical differences between the groups.
机译:研究设计:一项单盲,随机对照试验,前测后测设计,具有6周的治疗方案。目的:比较Mckenzie锻炼与基于垫子的普拉提锻炼在改善与CNLBP(慢性非特异性下腰痛)相关的疼痛,功能障碍和躯干ROM方面的效果。背景:Mckenzie和Pilates开发的治疗方法正在普及;但是,目前尚无关于其差异有效性的报道。方法和措施:将30名20至65岁的CNLBP体力活动受试者随机分为两组。根据评估结果,麦肯齐运动小组(MEG)接受了麦肯齐运动6周。而基于Mat的普拉提运动(MBPE)组在相同的6周时间内接受了普拉提运动。通过数字疼痛等级量表(NPRS)评估疼痛的预后指标,使用Rolland Morris残疾问卷(RMDQ)评估功能障碍,并使用改良的Schobers方法测量躯干ROM。使用Wilcoxon秩和检验和Mann-Whitney U检验来分析数据。结果:两组在疼痛(p <0.23),残疾(p <0.62),躯干屈曲(p <0.75)和躯干伸展(p <0.27)之间的结局数据之间的事后比较没有统计学差异。这些组显示出对所有单独评估的措施的改善,并且具有显着性(p <0.01)。结论:该结果可帮助理疗师进行临床决策。在组间比较因变量得分的变化后发现,各组之间无统计学差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号