首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Population Data Science >Evaluation of interventions to improve inpatient hospital documentation within electronic health records: A Systematic Review
【24h】

Evaluation of interventions to improve inpatient hospital documentation within electronic health records: A Systematic Review

机译:评估改善电子病历中住院医院文档的干预措施:系统评价

获取原文
           

摘要

IntroductionDespite increased use of electronic health records (EHRs), EHR documentation quality remains poor. Consequently, EHR data quality is also negatively affected. Many services, including disease surveillance and health services research, utilize EHR data. Accordingly, several studies have attempted to improve EHR documentation quality in the inpatient setting using various interventions. Objectives and ApproachThe purpose of this systematic review was to synthesize the literature, and assess the effectiveness of interventions seeking to improve inpatient EHR documentation quality. To identify relevant experimental, quasi-experimental and observational studies, a search strategy was developed based on elaborate inclusion/exclusion criteria using four main themes: EHR, documentation, interventions, and type of study. Four databases, Cochrane, Medline, EMBASE, and CINAHL, were searched. Study quality assessment and data extraction from selected studies were performed using a Downs and Black and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale hybrid tool, and a REDCap form, respectively. Data was then analyzed and synthesized in a narrative semi-quantitative manner. ResultsAn in-depth search of the identified databases, grey literature and reference lists, revealed a final 20 studies for inclusion in this systematic review. Due to high heterogeneity in study design, population, interventions, comparators, document types and outcomes, data could not be standardized for a quantitative comparison. However, statistically significant results in interventions and affected outcomes were further presented and discussed. A higher number of studies reported significantly improved EHR documentation when using the interventions: ‘Education’ and ‘Implementing a new EHR Reporting System’. When implementing two or more interventions, more outcome measures were affected. There was no association between study quality or study design and number of interventions used. Only one of the 20 studies found EHR documentation worsened with the interventions used. Conclusion/ImplicationsInterventions implemented to enhance EHR documentation are highly variable and require standardization. Emphasis should be placed on this novel area of research to improve communication between healthcare providers, enhance continuity of care, reduce the burden in health information management, and to facilitate data sharing between centers, provinces, and countries.
机译:简介尽管越来越多地使用电子病历(EHR),但EHR文档质量仍然很差。因此,EHR数据质量也受到负面影响。许多服务,包括疾病监测和健康服务研究,都使用EHR数据。因此,一些研究尝试使用各种干预措施来改善住院环境中的EHR文档质量。目的和方法本系统综述的目的是综合文献,并评估旨在改善住院EHR文档质量的干预措施的有效性。为了确定相关的实验,准实验和观察研究,基于精心设计的纳入/排除标准,使用四个主要主题开发了一种搜索策略:EHR,文献,干预措施和研究类型。搜索了四个数据库,Cochrane,Medline,EMBASE和CINAHL。分别使用Downs和Black和Newcastle-Ottawa Scale混合工具以及REDCap表格进行了所选研究的研究质量评估和数据提取。然后以叙述性半定量方式对数据进行分析和合成。结果深入搜索已确定的数据库,灰色文献和参考文献列表,发现最终有20篇研究被纳入本系统评价。由于研究设计,人群,干预措施,比较者,文件类型和结果的高度异质性,无法对数据进行标准化以进行定量比较。但是,进一步介绍和讨论了干预措施和受影响结果的统计学显着结果。越来越多的研究报告说,使用“教育”和“实施新的EHR报告系统”干预措施可以显着改善EHR文档。当实施两个或多个干预措施时,更多的结果措施受到影响。研究质量或研究设计与所用干预措施的数量之间没有关联。在20项研究中,只有一项发现EHR文档因所采用的干预措施而恶化。结论/含义为增强EHR文档而实施的干预措施变化很大,需要标准化。应将重点放在这一新颖的研究领域上,以改善医疗保健提供者之间的沟通,增强护理的连续性,减轻健康信息管理的负担,并促进中心,省和国家之间的数据共享。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号