首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Preventive Medicine >A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF COMMUNITY?BASED HEALTH PROGRAMS IN IRAN: AN EXPERIENCE OF PARTICIPATION IN I.R. IRAN
【24h】

A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF COMMUNITY?BASED HEALTH PROGRAMS IN IRAN: AN EXPERIENCE OF PARTICIPATION IN I.R. IRAN

机译:伊朗基于社区的健康计划的定性研究:I.R.参与的经验伊朗

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Community-based health programs (CBHPs) with participatory approaches has been recognized as an important tool in health promotion. The goal of this study was to understand the nature of participation practice in CBHP and to use the data to advocate for more participation-friendly policies in the community, academy and funding organizations.Methods: In this qualitative study, 13 CBHPs, which were active for last 5 years have been assessed using semi-structural in-depth interviews with programs principal and managers and focus group discussions with volunteers and service users. Data analysis was based on the deductive-inductive content analysis considering the participatory approaches in these programs.Results: The results show that, the main category of participation was divided to community participation and intersectional collaboration. The community participation level was very different from "main, " "advisory" or "supporting" level. The process of recruitment of volunteers by the governmental organization was centralized and in non-governmental organizations was quite different. According to respondents opinion, financial and spiritual incentives especially tangible rewards, e.g., learning skills or capacity building were useful for engaging and maintaining volunteers’ participation. For intersectional collaboration, strong and dedicated partners, supportive policy environment are critical.Conclusions: It seems that maintaining partnership in CBHP takes considerable time, financial support, knowledge development and capacity building.
机译:背景:采用参与式方法的基于社区的卫生计划(CBHP)被认为是促进健康的重要工具。这项研究的目的是了解CBHP参与实践的性质,并利用这些数据在社区,学术机构和资助组织中倡导更友好的参与政策。方法:在本定性研究中,有13个CBHP是活跃的通过对项目负责人和经理的半结构深入访谈以及与志愿者和服务使用者的焦点小组讨论,对过去五年的评估进行了评估。结果:结果表明,参与的主要类别分为社区参与和交叉合作。社区参与级别与“主要”,“咨询”或“支持”级别有很大差异。政府组织招募志愿者的过程是集中的,而在非政府组织中则完全不同。根据受访者的观点,财务和精神激励措施,特别是有形的奖励,例如学习技能或能力建设,对于吸引和保持志愿者的参与非常有用。对于交叉合作,强大而专注的合作伙伴而言,支持性政策环境至关重要。结论:在CBHP中维持合作伙伴关系似乎需要大量时间,财务支持,知识开发和能力建设。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号