...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Occupational Hygiene >Single-Axis and Three-Axis Probe Magnetic Field Meters in an Occupational Hygiene Study: A Comparative View
【24h】

Single-Axis and Three-Axis Probe Magnetic Field Meters in an Occupational Hygiene Study: A Comparative View

机译:职业卫生研究中的单轴和三轴探针式磁场计:一个比较视图

获取原文

摘要

ORIGINAL ARTICLE One type of electromagnetic fields, based on frequency range, is Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) fields. There are lots of reports about measuring ELF-magnetic field (MF) in substations, power plants, cities and etc. This study aimed to compare the difference between measurement of three-axis and single-axis probe MF meters. ELF-MF was measured by TES-1394 MF tester (three-axis probe) and HI-3604 ELF survey meter (single-axis probe) in selected power plant and the resultant of three MF components (X, Y, and Z) was calculated based on equation. Field measurement was based on IEEE std 644-1994. In the generator building, minimum, maximum, and mean values of the magnetic flux density measured by the three-axis device were greater than those measured by the other two methods. Besides, the maximum value of the resultant method was greater compared to the measurements related to the other two methods, but the means of magnetic flux density by the three-axis device was greater than the resultant and maximum axis value. However, a significant difference was found between the maximum axis value and the results of the three-axis device (P=0.022). The best and most reliable way to measure MF is using a device with a three-axis probe and measuring the maximum MF by the singe-axis device cannot be reliable. Moreover, in the absence of a device with a three-axis probe, if there is a single-axis probe, the best we can do is obtaining the resultant from the three directions of the field.
机译:原始文章一种基于频率范围的电磁场是极低频(ELF)场。关于在变电站,发电厂,城市等中测量ELF磁场(MF)的报道很多。本研究旨在比较三轴和单轴探头MF表的测量差异。 ELF-MF由TES-1394 MF测试仪(三轴探头)和HI-3604 ELF测量仪(单轴探头)在选定的发电厂中进行测量,三个MF分量(X,Y和Z)的结果为根据方程式计算。现场测量基于IEEE std 644-1994。在发电机大楼中,通过三轴设备测得的磁通密度的最小值,最大值和平均值都大于通过其他两种方法测得的磁通密度的最小值,最大值和平均值。此外,与其他两种方法相关的测量结果相比,所得方法的最大值更大,但是三轴设备的磁通密度平均值大于所得和最大轴值。但是,在最大轴值和三轴设备的结果之间发现了显着差异(P = 0.022)。最好的和最可靠的测量MF的方法是使用带有三轴探头的设备,而用单轴设备测量最大MF是不可靠的。而且,在没有带有三轴探头的设备的情况下,如果有单轴探头,我们能做的最好的就是从磁场的三个方向获得结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号