首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Information Technology >Tools and Techniques in Risk Assessment in Public Risk Management Organisations
【24h】

Tools and Techniques in Risk Assessment in Public Risk Management Organisations

机译:公共风险管理组织中的风险评估工具和技术

获取原文
           

摘要

Risk assessment and the knowledge provided through this process is a crucial part of any decision-making process in the management of risks and uncertainties. Failure in assessment of risks can cause inadequacy in the entire process of risk management, which in turn can lead to failure in achieving organisational objectives as well as having significant damaging consequences on populations affected by the potential risks being assessed. The choice of tools and techniques in risk assessment can influence the degree and scope of decision-making and subsequently the risk response strategy. There are various available qualitative and quantitative tools and techniques that are deployed within the broad process of risk assessment. The sheer diversity of tools and techniques available to practitioners makes it difficult for organisations to consistently employ the most appropriate methods. This tools and techniques adaptation is rendered more difficult in public risk regulation organisations due to the sensitive and complex nature of their activities. This is particularly the case in areas relating to the environment, food, and human health and safety, when organisational goals are tied up with societal, political and individuals’ goals at national and international levels. Hence, recognising, analysing and evaluating different decision support tools and techniques employed in assessing risks in public risk management organisations was considered. This research is part of a mixed method study which aimed to examine the perception of risk assessment and the extent to which organisations practise risk assessment’ tools and techniques. The study adopted a semi-structured questionnaire with qualitative and quantitative data analysis to include a range of public risk regulation organisations from the UK, Germany, France, Belgium and the Netherlands. The results indicated the public risk management organisations mainly use diverse tools and techniques in the risk assessment process. The primary hazard analysis; brainstorming; hazard analysis and critical control points were described as the most practiced risk identification techniques. Within qualitative and quantitative risk analysis, the participants named the expert judgement, risk probability and impact assessment, sensitivity analysis and data gathering and representation as the most practised techniques.
机译:风险评估和通过此过程提供的知识是风险和不确定性管理中任何决策过程的关键部分。风险评估失败可能会导致整个风险管理流程不足,进而导致无法实现组织目标,并对受评估的潜在风险影响的人群造成重大破坏性后果。风险评估中工具和技术的选择会影响决策的程度和范围,进而影响风险应对策略。在广泛的风险评估过程中部署了各种可用的定性和定量工具和技术。从业人员可用的工具和技术种类繁多,这使得组织很难始终采用最合适的方法。由于其活动的敏感性和复杂性,这种工具和技术的适应在公共风险监管组织中变得更加困难。当组织目标与国家,国际两级的社会,政治和个人目标捆绑在一起时,在与环境,食品以及人类健康和安全有关的领域尤其如此。因此,考虑了识别,分析和评估在公共风险管理组织中用于评估风险的不同决策支持工具和技术。这项研究是一项混合方法研究的一部分,旨在研究风险评估的观念以及组织实施风险评估工具和技术的程度。这项研究采用了具有定性和定量数据分析的半结构式问卷,其中包括来自英国,德国,法国,比利时和荷兰的一系列公共风险监管组织。结果表明,公共风险管理组织在风险评估过程中主要使用各种工具和技术。主要危害分析;头脑风暴;危害分析和关键控制点被描述为最实践的风险识别技术。在定性和定量风险分析中,与会人员将专家判断,风险概率和影响评估,敏感性分析以及数据收集和表示称为最实践的技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号