...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease >Patient preferences for inhaler devices in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: experience with Respimat? Soft Mist? Inhaler
【24h】

Patient preferences for inhaler devices in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: experience with Respimat? Soft Mist? Inhaler

机译:慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者对吸入器装置的偏爱:Respimat的经验?软雾?吸入器

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract: Current guidelines for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) recommend the regular use of inhaled bronchodilator therapy in order to relieve symptoms and prevent exacerbations. A variety of inhaler devices are currently available to COPD patients, and the choice of device is an important consideration because it can influence patients’ adherence to treatment, and thus potentially affect the long-term outcome. The Respimat? Soft Mist? Inhaler (SMI) generates a slow-moving aerosol with a high fine particle fraction, resulting in deposition of a higher proportion of the dose in the lungs than pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) or some dry powder inhalers (DPIs). We review clinical studies of inhaler satisfaction and preference comparing Respimat? SMI against other inhalers in COPD patients. Using objective and validated patient satisfaction instruments, Respimat? SMI was consistently shown to be well accepted by COPD patients, largely due to its inhalation and handling characteristics. In comparative studies with pMDIs, the patient total satisfaction score with Respimat? SMI was statistically and clinically significantly higher than with the pMDI. In comparative studies with DPIs, the total satisfaction score was statistically significantly higher than for the Turbuhaler? DPI, but only the performance domain of satisfaction was clinically significantly higher for Respimat? SMI. Whether the observed higher levels of patient satisfaction reported with Respimat? SMI might be expected to result in improved adherence to therapy and thus provide benefits consistent with those recently shown to be associated with sustained bronchodilator treatment in patients with COPD remains to be proven.
机译:摘要:当前的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)管理指南建议定期使用吸入性支气管扩张剂治疗,以缓解症状并防止病情加重。目前,COPD患者可以使用多种吸入器设备,因此选择设备是一个重要的考虑因素,因为它会影响患者对治疗的依从性,从而可能影响长期结果。 Respimat?软雾?吸入器(SMI)产生的缓慢移动的气溶胶具有较高的细颗粒分数,与加压定量吸入器(pMDI)或某些干粉吸入器(DPI)相比,导致肺部更大剂量的剂量沉积。我们将对Respimat?的吸入器满意度和偏爱性进行临床研究。 SPD对COPD患者的其他吸入器的影响。使用客观且经过验证的患者满意度工具,Respimat?一直以来,SMI一直被COPD患者广泛接受,这主要是由于其吸入和处理特性。在与pMDIs进行的比较研究中,Respimat?患者的总满意度得分? SMI在统计学上和临床上均显着高于pMDI。在使用DPI的比较研究中,总满意度得分在统计学上显着高于Turbuhaler? DPI,但对于Respimat ?,只有满意度的性能范围在临床上明显更高SMI。 Respimat是否观察到较高的患者满意度水平? SMI有望改善对治疗的依从性,从而提供与最近被证明与COPD患者持续支气管扩张剂治疗相关的益处一致的益处尚待证实。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号