...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Exercise Science >The Acute Effects of Static Stretching Compared to Dynamic Stretching with and without an Active Warm up on Anaerobic Performance
【24h】

The Acute Effects of Static Stretching Compared to Dynamic Stretching with and without an Active Warm up on Anaerobic Performance

机译:静态拉伸与动态拉伸(有或没有主动热身)相比对急性厌氧性能的急性影响

获取原文
           

摘要

International Journal of Exercise Science 10(1): 53-61, 2017. The Wingate Anaerobic Test (WAnT) has been used in many studies to determine anaerobic performance. However, there has been poor reporting of warm-up protocols and limited consistency between warm-up methods that have been used. With the WAnT being such a commonly-used test, consistency in warm-up methods is essential in order to compare results across studies. Therefore, this study was designed to compare how static stretching, dynamic stretching, and an active warm-up affect WAnT performance. Ten recreationally active participants (5 males, 5 females) with a mean (SD) age of 23.3 (0.7) volunteered for this study. Subjects were randomized to a specific order of five warm-up protocols, which were performed on individual days followed by a WAnT. Peak power, mean power, power drop, and fatigue index were compared for each trial using a repeated measures ANOVA. For peak power, results revealed that warm-up protocol had a significant effect, F(4,36) = 3.90, p = .01, partial η2 = .302. It was hypothesized that the dynamic stretching would lead to greater peak power than the static stretching protocol. However, results of post hoc analyses failed to detect a significant difference (p =.065). For the other measured variables no significant differences were found. The findings from this study suggest that warm-up protocols may have significantly different impacts on peak power during the WAnT. Additional research should use larger sample sizes and further explore these warm-up protocols. Developing a standardized warm-up protocol for the WAnT may improve consistency between studies.
机译:国际运动科学杂志10(1):53-61,2017年。Wingate厌氧测试(WAnT)已用于许多研究中以确定无氧运动表现。但是,关于热身协议的报告很少,并且所使用的热身方法之间的一致性有限。由于WAnT是一种常用的测试,为了比较各个研究的结果,预热方法的一致性至关重要。因此,本研究旨在比较静态拉伸,动态拉伸和主动预热如何影响WAnT性能。自愿参加本研究的十名娱乐活动参与者(男性5位,女性5位)平均(SD)年龄为23.3(0.7)。将受试者随机分配到五种预热方案的特定顺序,这些方案在单独的几天进行,然后进行WAnT。使用重复测量方差分析比较每个试验的峰值功率,平均功率,功率下降和疲劳指数。对于峰值功率,结果表明预热协议具有显着影响,F(4,36)= 3.90,p = 0.01,部分η2= 0.302。假设动态拉伸将比静态拉伸方案产生更大的峰值功率。但是,事后分析的结果未能发现显着差异(p = .065)。对于其他测量变量,未发现显着差异。这项研究的结果表明,预热协议可能会对WAnT期间的峰值功率产生明显不同的影响。其他研究应使用更大的样本量,并进一步探索这些预热方案。为WAnT开发标准化的预热协议可能会改善研究之间的一致性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号