...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Comparison of the Combined Obesity Indices to Predict Cardiovascular Diseases Risk Factors and Metabolic Syndrome in Northeast China
【24h】

Comparison of the Combined Obesity Indices to Predict Cardiovascular Diseases Risk Factors and Metabolic Syndrome in Northeast China

机译:肥胖综合指标预测东北地区心血管疾病危险因素和代谢综合征的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Obesity is associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors (hypertension, dyslipidemia and diabetes) and metabolic syndrome (MetS), and it may be flawed that most studies only use one obesity index to predict these risk factors. Therefore, our study aims to compare the various combined obesity indices systematically, and to find the optimal combined obesity indices to predict CVD risk factors and MetS. Methods: A total of 16,766 participants aged 18–79 years old were recruited in Jilin Province in 2012. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) curves and multiple logistic regressions were used to evaluate the predictive capacity of the combined obesity indices for CVD risk factors and MetS. Results: The adjusted area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) with two combined obesity indices had been improved up to 19.45%, compared with one single obesity index. In addition, body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) were the optimal combinations, where the AUROC (95% confidence interval (CI)) for hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes and MetS in males were 0.730 (0.718, 0.740), 0.694 (0.682, 0.706), 0.725 (0.709, 0.742) and 0.820 (0.810, 0.830), and in females were 0.790 (0.780, 0.799), 0.727 (0.717, 0.738), 0.746 (0.731, 0.761) and 0.828 (0.820, 0.837), respectively. Conclusions: The more abnormal obesity indices that one has the higher the risk for CVD risk factors and MetS, especially in males. In addition, the combined obesity indices have better predictions than one obesity index, where BMI and WC are the optimal combinations.
机译:肥胖与心血管疾病(CVD)危险因素(高血压,血脂异常和糖尿病)和代谢综合征(MetS)相关,大多数研究仅使用一种肥胖指数来预测这些危险因素可能存在缺陷。因此,我们的研究旨在系统地比较各种综合肥胖指数,并找到最佳的综合肥胖指数来预测CVD危险因素和MetS。方法:2012年,吉林省共招募了16766名年龄在18-79岁之间的参与者。受试者的工作特征曲线(ROC)曲线和多元logistic回归用于评估肥胖综合指数对CVD危险因素和危险因素的预测能力。大都会结果:与一个单一的肥胖指数相比,具有两个合并的肥胖指数的接受者工作特征(AUROC)下的调整面积已提高了19.45%。此外,体重指数(BMI)和腰围(WC)是最佳组合,其中男性高血压,血脂异常,糖尿病和MetS的AUROC(95%置信区间(CI))为0.730(0.718,0.740), 0.694(0.682,0.706),0.725(0.709,0.742)和0.820(0.810,0.830),女性分别为0.790(0.780,0.799),0.727(0.717,0.738),0.746(0.731,0.761)和0.828(0.820, 0.837)。结论:肥胖指数越多,表明患CVD危险因素和MetS的风险越高,尤其是男性。此外,组合的肥胖指数比一个肥胖指数(BMI和WC是最佳组合)具有更好的预测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号