首页> 外文期刊>Indian journal of Anaesthesia >Randomised double-blind comparative study of dexmedetomidine and tramadol for post-spinal anaesthesia shivering
【24h】

Randomised double-blind comparative study of dexmedetomidine and tramadol for post-spinal anaesthesia shivering

机译:右美托咪定和曲马多用于脊髓麻痹后的随机双盲对照研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Background and Aims:Dexmedetomidine (α2 adrenergic agonist) has been used for prevention of post anaesthesia shivering. Its use for the treatment of post-spinal anaesthesia shivering has not been evaluated. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy, haemodynamic and adverse effects of dexmedetomidine with those of tramadol, when used for control of post-spinal anaesthesia shivering.Methods:A prospective, randomised, and double-blind study was conducted in 50 American Society of Anaesthesiologists Grade I and II patients of either gender, aged between 18 and 65 years, scheduled for various surgical procedures under spinal anaesthesia. The patients were randomised in two groups of 25 patients each to receive either dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg or tramadol 0.5 mg/kg as a slow intravenous bolus. Grade of shivering, onset of shivering, time for cessation of shivering, recurrence, response rate, and adverse effects were observed at scheduled intervals. Unpaired t-test was used for analysing the data.Results:Time taken for cessation of shivering was significantly less with dexmedetomidine when compared to tramadol. Nausea and vomiting was observed only in tramadol group (28% and; 20% respectively). There was not much difference in the sedation profile of both the drugs.Conclusion:We conclude that although both drugs are effective, the time taken for cessation of shivering is less with dexmedetomidine when compared to tramadol. Moreover, dexmedetomidine has negligible adverse effects, whereas tramadol is associated with significant nausea and vomiting.
机译:背景与目的:右美托咪定(α2肾上腺素能激动剂)已用于预防麻醉后发抖。尚未评估其在治疗脊髓麻痹后的使用。这项研究的目的是评估和比较右美托咪定与曲马多在控制脊髓麻痹后的疗效,血流动力学和不良反应。 50名美国麻醉医师学会,年龄在18至65岁之间的I级和II级性别患者,计划在脊柱麻醉下进行各种外科手术。将患者随机分为两组,每组25名患者,以慢速静脉推注方式接受右美托咪定0.5μg/ kg或曲马多0.5 mg / kg。在预定的时间间隔内观察到了颤抖的程度,颤抖的开始,颤抖的停止时间,复发,反应率以及不良反应。结果:右美托咪定组与曲马多组相比,停止发抖所需的时间明显更少。仅在曲马多组中观察到恶心和呕吐(分别为28%和20%)。结论:我们得出的结论是,尽管两种药物均有效,但与曲马多相比,右美托咪定戒烟所需的时间更少。此外,右美托咪定的不良反应可忽略不计,而曲马多与明显的恶心和呕吐相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号