首页> 外文期刊>Indian journal of Anaesthesia >A comparative study of efficacy of propofol auto-co-induction versus midazolam propofol co-induction using the priming principle
【24h】

A comparative study of efficacy of propofol auto-co-induction versus midazolam propofol co-induction using the priming principle

机译:使用启动原理对异丙酚自共诱导与咪达唑仑丙泊共诱导疗效的比较研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Application of priming principle is well documented in relation to the use of muscle relaxants. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of priming technique in relation to induction agents. Clinical efficacy in terms of dose reduction and alteration in peri-intubation haemodynamics was compared in propofol auto-co-induction and midazolam propofol co-induction groups along with a control group. The study was carried out in 90 patients scheduled for upper abdominal surgery, who were randomly divided into three equal groups. Group I received 0.5 mg/kg propofol IV (20% of the pre-calculated induction dose), group II received 0.05 mg/kg IV midazolam and group III received 3 ml of normal saline. This was followed by IV induction with propofol 2 minutes later in all the three groups at a predetermined rate till the bispectral index value of 45 was attained. The results showed a significant decrease in induction dose requirement in both the groups but haemodynamic stability during induction and intubation was more in propofol auto-co-induction group.Keywords: Priming principle, propofol, auto-co-induction, bispectral index
机译:与使用肌肉松弛剂有关的灌注原理的应用已得到充分证明。本研究的目的是评估与诱导剂相关的启动技术的功效。比较了异丙酚自动共诱导组和咪达唑仑丙泊酚共诱导组以及对照组在剂量减少和插管周围血流动力学改变方面的临床疗效。这项研究是针对90名计划进行上腹部手术的患者进行的,他们被随机分为三组。 I组接受0.5 mg / kg丙泊酚IV(预计算的诱导剂量的20%),II组接受0.05 mg / kg IV咪达唑仑,III组接受3 ml生理盐水。随后2分钟后,在三组中以预定速率用异丙酚进行IV诱导,直到达到双光谱指数值为45。结果显示,两组的诱导剂量需求量均显着降低,但异丙酚自动共诱导组的诱导和插管过程中的血流动力学稳定性更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号