...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology >Cognitive flexibility and response inhibition in patients with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Generalized Anxiety Disorder
【24h】

Cognitive flexibility and response inhibition in patients with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Generalized Anxiety Disorder

机译:强迫症和广泛性焦虑症患者的认知灵活性和反应抑制

获取原文
           

摘要

Background/ObjectiveThe main aim of this study was to analyze differences in inhibition and cognitive flexibility, taking into account some variables that may influence results (non verbal reasoning, depression, anxiety, intolerance of uncertainty, comorbidity, medication consumption).MethodThe participants were 95 adults aged 17-61 years old (M=33.48,SD=11.13), primary (most severe) Generalized Anxiety Disorder or Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and a healthy control group. Neuropsychological neasures were completed using computerized Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, Stroop Color Word Test and Go/NoGo Task.ResultsClinical groups presented worse results in cognitive flexibility to the control group. The obsessive-compulsive group showed worse scores in flexibility than the generalized anxiety group, once non-verbal reasoning and tolerance to uncertainty were controlled. Comorbidity and medication use did not affect results in the obsessive compulsive group but did however influence the generalized anxiety group.ConclusionsCognitive flexibility could be included treatment in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder.
机译:背景/目的本研究的主要目的是分析抑制和认知灵活性方面的差异,并考虑可能影响结果的一些变量(非言语推理,抑郁,焦虑,不确定性的不耐受,合并症,药物消耗)。方法参加者为95岁成人年龄17-61岁(M = 33.48,SD = 11.13),原发(最严重)的广泛性焦虑症或强迫症和健康对照组。使用计算机的威斯康星卡片分类测试,Stroop彩色单词测试和Go / NoGo任务来完成神经心理学的镇定。结果临床组的认知灵活性较对照组差。一旦控制了非语言推理和对不确定性的容忍度,强迫症组的柔韧性得分要比广义焦虑组差。合并症和药物使用并没有影响强迫症组的结果,但是却影响了广泛性焦虑组。结论认知灵活性可以包括在强迫症和广泛性焦虑症的治疗中。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号